“They found another rifle, a Glock, more ammunition. But the most worrying thing they found was a manila paper with a rework on Justice Sonia Sotomayor,” Salas said in the interview.
A spokesman for the Supreme Court declined to comment on the report and said the court did not discuss safety as a matter of court policy.
“Judges know that criticism is coming in this area, but threatening rulings from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate but dangerous,” Roberts said at the time.
Salas and others are working to pass legislation that will protect the personally identifiable information of judges from publishing on public websites.
“Who knows what could have happened?” Salas told CBS. “But we must understand that judges are in danger. That we put ourselves in great danger every day because we are doing our job.”
James Duff, then director of the U.S. Courts Administrative Office, told Congress last year that there were 4,449 threats and inappropriate communications in 2019, compared to 926 such incidents in 2015, according to the U.S. Marshals Service.