The legal agreement that Britney Spears managed to manage his own life and finances has more than what the pop star had when he appeared with a 12-year-old energy channel on Disney Channel, and the controversy over who the governing wing is to make ebullición.
Spears, 39, has been living in this restricted court since his infamous conviction, which in 2008 led a California court to evict a single legal guardian over all actions against his father, Jamie.
The tutelage, reasons and terminology set forth in confidential judicial documents have been the subject of a mayoral scrutiny in recent years, especially since Spears canceled his second residency in Las Vegas in 2019 and entered into an indefinite professional parenthesis.
Now, an FX documentary produced in association with The New York Times is taking place on the popular holiday about Spears, who joined the global family when his teenager was giving birth, including “Baby One More Time”, before a dramatic tragedy broke out the appetizing cannibal of the paparazzi.
The poem contains the paper of the press of the coronation and the celebrities of the principles of the decade of 2000 in the disgrace of Spears, showing how a mediocre objective persevered without pause.
The #FreeBritney movement (Liberen to Britney), in which militant tens of thousands of fanatical miles have been created that it is a rehearsal, has gone through the process of putting the pressure on the court to succeed in the role of tutor.
His defenders, many women -including Jamie Spears- consider him simply conspiratorial, making sure the star can help with coded messages, emoticons and including the color of his ropa in his eccentric Instagram account.
They reivindican that Spears has given enough signals to recover his own custody, even though he’s appointed by the judge to the court a juez: “My client informed me that she has lost her father”.
The juez opted for not immediately removing Spears’ father as the owner of his estate, but named after the financial company Bessemer Trust as the custodian.
Jamie Spears gave a pass in 2019 in his custody of Britney, a paper that God can include on his medical and mental health decisions, after suffering a colon rupture.
The pop icon now does not eliminate the tutelage, a legal figure normally intended for seniors or women, but is provided to professionals.
She aspires that the tutor who now has the custodian provisional on her persona sieandolo, and the taste that a bank manages its finances.
The next judicial hearing is scheduled for February 11.
The documentary “Framing Britney Spears” suggests that the superstar of global pop was manipulated and led to the emotional ruin of an insecure media entity, in which its images were sold for more than a million dollars.
Since its release as a pre-adolescent star in “Star Search” in 1992 has been appearing with the rapid cabbage in 2007, the documentary devoted to a magnetic superstar, whose image is converted to all but its own.
The documentary shows the famous presenter Diane Sawyer expressing the pressure to explain why “hizo algo” to cause “so much pain” on his part, the lesser known Justin Timberlake, in his rupture, a situation that dies in Spears, as well as an interview, as “the class of the class”.
And Matt Lauer, the ex-figure of the matinee television now in the dark, hailed to appear in a 2006 interview in which he fights against his physical state while being embarrassed by his second hive.
During his prolonged mental breakdown following his divorce in 2006 and the battle over the custody of his wives, Spears was photographed at service stations descending or driving with his wife on his back.
In another scene, a paraguay and commence to gallop the vehicle of a paparazzi, an image that is iconic.
Moya Luckett, a media historian at the New York University who researches the culture of celebrities, says that the “cruelty” that Spears experimented with in a panorama of social speeches in which the stars could select their own images .
“You believe in your own producer,” said Luckett, who starred as Taylor Swift or Beyonce as he supported the Instagram conversation and participated in his documentaries.
Although his legal battle has increased, it is likely that the fascination with Spears persists, especially because of the fanatics, many of them in their 30s and 40s, who adore him in his youth, even as the difficult situation of the singer.
“Everywhere you look today, the tide of protectionist sentiment is flowing. In a world of neoliberalism we must say that we can do everything we want,” said Luckett.
“And we will discover that we really do not know”.