(CNN) – When one day he spoke as president, Donald Trump without hesitation began to consider how he would record history. Las primeras devoluciones geen son prometore.“On various occasions, Trump has suggested that he hope to occupy his place in the list of ex-presidents and a lad of Abraham Lincoln, presumably superior to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and all the women who encapsulate the list,” wrote Presidential historian Joseph Ellis in an opinion piece for Los Angeles Times this week. “To be honest, we need to adjust our expectations,” he said.
And Ellis added: “It is very likely that Donald Trump will hold the title of president in the history of the United States.”
Deciding to classify the presidents is, without a doubt, a very subjective issue. In general, there are people like Ellis, academics and authors who have dedicated their professional life to the presidency. Maybe this group does not have a natural inclination to like Trump’s anti-intellectual decision in order to, well, all.
But they are the people who tend to classify the presidents. Some of the most recent ratings and positions are Trump’s.
The factors that analyze the classifications
In 2019, Siena College will publish a public sus susltimas clasificaciones. These are the results of the combined opinions of 159 presidential academics that qualify as one of the 44 men who are president (Grover Cleveland was president of the vice!) In 20 different aspects of the job. (The categories of “integrity” have “disposition to assume risks” and “suerte”).
In his classifications, Trump quedated in the most anticipated lie. Only one of them is James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson.
“The president in charge has intervened in the poll between the 15º, Obama, and the 23º, GW Bush, has announced that academics will commence and observe their logos, evaluate their abilities and study their attributes,” said Don Levy, who directs the voting operation of Siena College. “This year, Donald Trump will enter the poll in office 42, and only he will run for the last five seats in two of the 20 categories used by academics to evaluate the presidents, the ‘right’ and the disposition to asumir riesgos’ ».
In the “suerte”, Trump occupied the decimal place. In the “Disposition to correct risks”, he occupied the 25º. (Recall that this was published in the principles of 2019, much antes that the world would like to talk about “covid-19”. It is very likely that the pandemic allegation reduces the point of “Trump” “certainty” in future polls).
Preliminary results from Otros
The other study has large dimensions regarding the best (and few) presidents will be announced in 2018. It is by Brandon Rottinghaus of the University of Houston and Justin S. Vaughn of the State University of Boise. The study, known as the “Survey on Presidential Grand Presidential Execution and Political Politics,” consulted 170 members of the Estadounidense Association of Political Scientists.
Trump occupied the last solid place on the list, debating Buchanan, William Henry Harrison, Franklin Pierce and Johnson, respectively. Al ser discriminates the list for relative ideology, ‘n Trump le fue un poco mejor. Among the women identified as conservatives, Trump was classified as the 40th most president. (Buchanan led the election of the Conservatives as president). Among the moderates and liberals in the poll, Trump occupies the ultimate place for lies.
Trump and Monte Rushmore
This same group has the question of who will host the next president included in the Monte Rushmore. (This is a theoretical question and I do not have much space to add a car to Monte Rushmore). Only the presidents will have votes for the two: Franklin Roosevelt (108) and Barack Obama (12). Trump made a total of 0 votes.
This will be a tragedy for Trump, who, then The New York Times, habló de la posibilidad de sumar su rostro al Monte Rushmore con la gobernadora de Dakota del Sur, Kristi Noem. Esto, de Noem, the escalator on theme:
“Dijo, ‘Kristi, come here. Dame la mano ‘», le dijo Noem al Argus-Leader de Sioux Falls sober una reunion con Trump en la Oficina Oval. “The man and the day have passed: ‘Senor President, Deberia is coming to the South Dakota at any moment. Tenemos el Monte Rushmore ‘. And he said, ‘Do you think I’m going to have my car in Mount Rushmore?’ ”. Ek eché a reír. It’s not known, as it’s serious ».
(Note to the margin: Noem le dio a Trump a replica of a search of a subway of Monte Rushmore with his rostro in it. No es broma.)
It seems unlikely that the time has benefited Trump
Now, make historical juices about a president at the end of his term, including immediately after finalization, is a deadlock. Ulysses S. Grant has been widely seen as an intermediary since his presidency, but he has had much more to do with the light of history. (Grant occupies 24th power in Siena and 21st in the “Presidential Grand Survey”). The same thing happened to George HW Bush (21º in Siena, 17º in the “Presidential Grand Survey”).
But, at least in the first instance, it seems unlikely that Trump will benefit this time. Despite the fact that these presidential classifications were lost in the second half of Trump’s term, that he was dominated by the failed coronavirus pandemic maneuver by his Gobierno, his response to the Black Lives Matter protests in the will be 2020 and its accusations will be based on electoral fraud in 2020. Nothing will be better with the passing of time. Without mentioning the heck that Trump hizo history this week as the only president to be sometime in the political juice of the past.
“I suspect that the tourist guides in the National Historical Hito of Buchanan, Wheatland, in Pennsylvania, are celebrating”, concluded Ellis in his opinion column. Deben will have the affective experience that his man will never have to be the last one », dijo.