Why could this be the year Dave Gettleman breaks his NFL draft blueprint?

Is this the year Dave Gettleman, for the first time in his nine years as general manager of the NFL, traded in an NFL draft?

This can make sense for a variety of reasons.

  • The Giants own the overall number 11, a spot in the first round where they are likely to have a group of three or four players with similar grades, giving them the option to move down a few spots and still be a player to get what they want. while also adding concept capital, in the form of a coveted extra second-day choice.
  • There may not be a defensive player taken in the top ten picks, which means the Giants can move back a few places and land their best edge rucksack, definitely a need.
  • Given the expenditure on free agencies at a time when the salary cap has made an unprecedented drop, it makes financial sense to get an extra choice on the second day of the draft, which adds value and cheap labor to the roster for this season and also for 2022, a year in which the Giants could be in an essential salary cap.

“Everything we do has an immediate and one, two, three year horizon, and we’re always mindful of how things affect us today and how they affect us next year and beyond,” said Giants Assistant Kevin Abrams. general manager, said Tuesday. . “We know a lot about all the variables.”

Abrams, also the Giants’ chief contract negotiator, conceded that he “probably did some practice actions we normally try to avoid” during this free agency, adding load and destructive years to contracts in a spending process designed around the talent level on the grid. The results were striking. Abrams created mega offers for wide receiver Kenny Golladay (four years, $ 72 million) and cornerback Adoree ‘Jackson (three years, $ 39 million), while also adding Kyle Rudolph and defender Devontae Booker. Not to mention, the Giants also opened the vault on a three-year $ 63 million extension for the Leonard Williams defensive line.

“I feel that our position is much better now than at the end of the season and that the off-season is not over yet, so we will have more opportunities to add players,” Abrams said. “I think we feel good about what we did. I think we are a deeper, more talented team. ”

Gettleman said he is confident the first part of the player acquisition process has delivered the desired goods.

“It will only be quantified in the fall and we start playing in September, but we feel very good about what we did. We feel very good about the direction the team has taken,” Gettleman said. “We really feel we are building a solid football team that the fans can be proud of.”

Dave Gettlemen has never traded in the NFL draft before
Dave Gettlemen has never traded in the NFL draft before
Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post

Next: the 2021 NFL draft. The Giants currently have only six picks – one in the first four rounds, none in the fifth round, two in the sixth round and none in the seventh round. They want to add at least one choice, and a decrease is the way to do it. Of course, they need to locate a partner. Would the Patriots be willing to move up from No. 15 to No. 11, perhaps to take a quarter? In 2018, the Raiders moved up from 15 to 10 in the first round, giving the Cardinals two additional picks, one in the third round and one in the fifth round.

As it stands now, the Giants possess the overall number 116 in the fourth round and they do not have a choice again until 196 in the sixth round. It’s long to see players get off the board.

An extra pick gives the Giants an extra rookie contract that is good for four years at a team-friendly price. As a result of the global pandemic, the maximum amount of 2021 is $ 182.5 million, a decrease of $ 16 million over 2020. Gettleman and Abrams, with the blessing of ownership, were able to spend freely in free agencies. The salary cap in 2022 may not rise above $ 200 million, but with the advent of new television money, it could expand to $ 230 million in 2023.

“I think 2022 could be a bit of a challenge, depending on where the cap goes,” Abrams said. “In addition, I’m more optimistic that nothing we did last year puts us in a precarious position this year. We’ll see.

‘It could depend on scientific legislators and state legislators and supporters in stalls and many other variables to see how it goes. But I do not think we have a bad place, but next year it may be a little more challenging than probably the years after that. ‘

.Source