Josh Rogin, columnist for the Washington Post, ignited the media because they remain silent while the outbreak of the coronavirus under dr. Anthony Fauci’s surveillance developed into a pandemic.
In an interview with Megyn Kelly on Wednesday, Rogin revealed that scientists who want to express the details of COVID-19 may not do so, as research funding comes from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that are influenced or managed by Fauci . .
“I often talk to scientists who say the same thing, who say, ‘Listen, we really want to talk about this, but we can not do it. Why can we not do it? Well, we get all our funding from NIH, or NIAID. … run by Dr. Fauci, ” he said on Kelly’s podcast. “And so we can say nothing like,” Oh, research on functions can be dangerous, or it might come from a laboratory, “because we’re losing our careers, we’ll lose our finances, we’re not going to be able to do the job.”
WHO ADVISOR SAY REPORTS ON PURCHASED ORIGINS ‘EXCELLENT’, WHO DOES NOT SERIOUSLY INVESTIGATE LAB LEKHYPHOTES
Research into functional functions, which puts pressure on the transmission and mutation of pathogens, was advanced five years before the coronavirus outbreak in China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology – which receives funding to conduct research from the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases . (NIAID) which is under the supervision of Fauci.
“The head of finance, the head of the whole field, is actually Anthony Fauci,” he said. “He’s the godfather of feature research as we know it. Again, just what I said there is too hot for TV, because people do not want to think that our hero of the pandemic … can also be linked to this research, which may also be related to the outbreak. ‘
Rogin explained that Fauci did nothing illegal to apply this variation of research, but that he should still be held ‘once and for all’ responsible for the apparent connection, especially by the media.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“This is what we call a big matzo ball,” he said. “People can not get it through their heads, but that’s the reality.”
“We do not have a media environment where we can have the kind of discussions where we can say, ‘Okay, listen, scientists are good people. They were trying to prevent the pandemic. Maybe their research got out of hand in this Chinese laboratory.’ “And maybe we should get to the heart of it. Is it too much to ask?”