Twitter said it acknowledged receipt of the notice and sought a “formal dialogue” with the Indian government.
“The safety of our employees is a top priority for us on Twitter,” a company spokesman told CNN Business. “We are still working on the government of India from a position of respect,” the spokesperson added.
The Indian government has not responded to several requests for comment.
Who will cut first?
With more than 700 million internet users, India is a large and important market for global technology companies, although it remains uncertain as the government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to tighten its grip on the internet and social media.
“The shrinking space for civil society is reflected by censorship and anti-democratic regulations to censor users of their rights to freedom of speech,” said Thenmozhi Soundararajan, executive director of the advocacy group Equality Labs. “It’s time for the world to understand how much danger there is right now and that US companies like Twitter and Facebook need to act before it’s too late.”
Twitter seems to be facing opposition to the Indian government at the moment by keeping the accounts active.
“We review every report we receive from the government as soon as possible, and take appropriate steps regarding such reports, while ensuring that we protect our fundamental values and commitment to public discourse,” the company spokesman said. “We strongly believe that the open and free exchange of information has a positive global impact, and that the tweets should continue to flow.”
But if the government prefers to compensate for the threats or exacerbate the situation, Twitter is left with few good options.
“There are two main risks: the first is for Twitter employees in India, who could be at risk if the company does not meet the requirements,” said Jillian York, director of freedom of expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
“The second risk is that Twitter continues to refuse and be blocked in India. While this may be the right moral outcome, it is obviously not the best result for the Indian people, many of whom rely on social media to get important messages out about what is happening on the ground, ”she added.
Thread the needle
While Twitter and the Indian government remain on a stalemate with each other, both parties must also deal with external investigation.
“Jack has shown in the past that he can lead with his values,” Soundararajan said, referring to Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter.
“The fundamental problem is consistency … are they able to do the same kind of contextual analysis that they did around QAnon posts, hydroxychloroquine posts and Trump’s incitement?” said David Kaye, a professor of law at the University of California, Irvine, who previously served as United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Advancement and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Expression and Expression. “India is a wonderful example of how difficult it is.”
“I think there is still a risk that Modi in particular appears to be incapable of dealing with such fundamental democratic principles, such as the right to peaceful assembly, the right to protest, the right to criticize, and so on,” he said. Kaye said. “I think it will be interesting to see if the government of Biden and other governments, which are friendly to India but in the democratic camp, really encourage the government to take a different approach here.”
CNN’s Manveena Suri and Esha Mitra contributed to this report.