#TrumpBanned: los dueños de las redes han hablado

At the time of establishing oneself if an action transgressed the freedom of expression we could think of the parade that Karl Popper planted in The Sociedad abierta y sus enemigos (1945). The Austrian philosopher exposes that sustaining an unlimited tolerance has a group of intolerant ones using the destruction of tolerance, by itself, in the name of tolerance, when society needs the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

In view of the violent discourse that the President of the United States of America has propagated through socio-digital speeches, evidently it is an asunti that requires expectation of a contemporary manner y, now that it’s time to leave the wreck, you’ve been suicidal. In just one week, Donald Trump, one of the most powerful men in the world with more than 88 million followers on his Twitter account, has been suspended in a permanent manner as user of the red carpet paul to incite to violence, in addition to posting suspensions to the large space in his Facebook and Instagram accounts by socavar the pacific and legal transition of power in his country.

The “ban” (restriction) in speeches made to Trump has been converted, as many times, into a polarized discussion. Between the 8th and 9th of January the trend #TrumpBanned in the United States agglutinate 278 miles messages coming only from this country, también surgieron voces polarizadas de otros 44 paises. For a lad, the tutors complaining about the baneo arguing that the discourse of violence must be fought on digital platforms, revenge of what revenge. On the other hand, Trump’s supporters are demonstrating their preoccupation with the attack on freedom of expression that the “magnates of Silicon Valley” are stuttering, prophesying an informative dictatorship.

However, men and women can interpret the suspension of digital platform accounts as combating violent discourse or attacking freedom of expression. It is important to reflect on the issues and the impact of the decisions taken by both socio-digital speeches on the debate and public interest, with the aim of constructing a more transparent regulation.

A public blog and an official blog on Twitter, the platform informs that the permanent suspension of the account @ realDonaldTrump will be due to publications made on January 8. First of all, the leaders of the social network of the year will interpret that the words “Patriotas estadounidenses”, usadas por el presidente, respaldan to the violent protesters who recently took over the Capitol. According to the second allotment, the highly executive executives like Trump, to announce that it will not go to the position of Joe Biden’s position, reaffirms among its followers that the elections will not be legitimate, which will disrupt the political transition.

The scrutiny and posterior juicio that some people sometimes are by Donald Trump’s tits is exaggerated, at no time are these messages inciting violence, for which the permanent suspension is not imposed. In her socio-digital credentials, Trump condemned his history, his family of malice, and his few days remaining in the cargo of the United States. For its part, the communiqué posted on Twitter’s blog revealing the supremacy of its leaders alone to reconcile the president’s subliminal intentions with the time to elect his speeches, also to identify with total certainty the reading of white supremacists que trasgredieron el Capitolio.

Society has the right not to tolerate the intolerant, but the two digital platforms are capable of representing society in its conjunction, for that matter, it tends to be the only faculties to decide on the good and the bad that its negotiations generate debate and public interest. It works to build regulatory markets that transparent the suspense processes in the case of key users, as well as more precise definitions of the rules and conditions of use, because of the observed, many words have incentives to incite violence.

Abraham Lira is Master in Communication of the University of Mexico (UNAM) National University of Technology (UNAM) with a focus on technology, with professional experience as content creator, media coordinator and digital social speakers in local local art goblins investigation coordinated with the National Institute of Public Administration of Spain and the Institute of Public Health of the University of Chile; has hosted conferences on political discourse, open government, transparency and the governing use of digital social media. The topics he specializes in are: political and institutional communication, public administration, electronic governance, networking strategies, analysis of social speeches, political discourse and media content.

MORE ABOUT THIS THEME:

Limits to the freedom of expression: the preoccupation with the power of digital speeches, the Trump case

Twitter, Trump and the United States