Regina Cañas confession has simulated a preamble and thus justifies the origin of the money that he used for a car deal.
The television presenter, Regina María Cañas Rivera, artistically known as “Tía Bubu”, confessed that he was the culprit in the crime of money laundering the Juzgado Séptimo de Instruction to avoid him in prison.
Cañas Rivera, owned by Mauricio Funes, also raised $ 95,000 for what was charged. The former was paid back to the State for the cause, according to the General Tax, with a property value of $ 62,780.89 and $ 32,220 in effect.
You may be interested in: Regina Cañas, “Tía Bubu”, will confess delicacies in case of lava dinner of the deceased Funes to the former Funes
“Sum a total of $ 95,000.89 and concept of civil liability insurance”, verklaar la la Fiscalía General.
Canas and his wife Diego Funes are being prosecuted for the Saqueo Público case, as Mauricio Funes signaled to have a structure that extradited the State $ 351 million during its management period.
The confession that preceded the judgment and the revolution of the din was part of the agreement that was with the Fiscalía. If you negotiate a price that is excusable.
Jorge Hernández, who at the time was hearing about the money laundering allegation, declared as a witness at the hearing to corroborate the Cañas confession.
VEA: These are the unjustified funds of Diego Roberto, hijo del expresidente Funes
The referendum was scheduled for the next March in the audience at which the sentence that will be imposed on Tía Bubu will be announced.
Dinner was deposited in August
The $ 32,220 will be donated by Cañas on August 17, 2020 to the Unity Fund in the Custodia of the Ministry of Health.
In addition, the defense of Cañas Rivera notified the 28th of January passed to Juzgado Séptimo de Instruction that the civilian condensate is assured with the furniture that has been made available to demand annotation, according to Fiscalía.
TE AANBEVELING: Regina Cañas, exeposa de Funes, niega que haya ofrecido devolver dinere:
Pese a que entregó dinier y la propiedad, Canas alegó a la salida de la audience que ella acudió al juzgado para “aceptar que sí, efctivemente yo lo que hice fue proteger a mi hijo, pero de eso a yo tomé dinero que tenga que devolver y que ha sido robado hay una gran diferencia ”.
“I would like to clarify that in the tax-related allegations of the same taxpayers we will never find a penny of money that will not be given to me, my accusation will only be to take the money that is not mine”, declares El Mundo and La Prensa Gráfica .