The ultimate case of alarmism during the evacuation: what should happen next to the new Johnson & Johnson evacuation

It’s the ultimate case of alarmism over vacancies.

A lotos estadounidenses the preoccupation that the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vacuum is an inferior product that does not hurt the pen is obtained. North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum recently declared The Washington Post what time is it now “Dudas about vacancies”, also means “the potential of dudas about markets”.

The perceived perception of the efficiency indicators of the three vacancies: 72% by Johnson & Johnson, ahead of 94% of Modern and 95% of Pfizer. But these indexes can be engaging in some aspects.

The most important medium -if the vaccine provides a serious disease- show that the Johnson & Johnson vacancy is effective if the other two. All work for 100% of people. The panorama is the most turbulent for the living cases, but it is especially preoccupying.

I would like to review the statistics on the three vacancies and explain why the actual perception is a problem.

Embedded with an anecdote that this bulletin has included in some occasion: El Dr. William Schaffner, Expert in infectious diseases of the Vanderbilt University, hablaba hace poco con algunos colegas sobre lo que le dirían ‘n onbekende que pudiera elegir entre recibir la vacuna de Johnson & Johnson mañana or one of the other vacancies within three weeks.

“Todos dijimos: ‘Ponte la de manana'”, says Schaffner related to my colleague Denise Grady. “The virus is bad”.

A COVID leve means victory

The figures of Titular efficacy – as much as 72% – describes the ability of a vaccine to prevent all infections with this coronavirus, known as SARS-CoV-2. But to prevent all infections are less important than what appears. The world will not eliminate the SARS-Cov-2 in short order. The coronavirus circulates all the time, causing the common cold and other man-made diseases.

The problem with this virus is its lethality. It took 15 weeks to report a seizure media seizure. Convert COVID-19 into something more than a flu catch or a common commemoration of the victory over the pandemic.

The three vacancies that are being used in EE.UU. stand logrese this objective. In research investigations, none of the persons receiving the COVID-19 vaccine murmur. And yet the vacancies hiccuped full effect, tampoco hubo no hospitalization.

In the real world, vacancies do not produce results that steal. Aun así, the results are excellent, and equally excellent in the three cases, como dijo el Dr. Cody Meissner, of the Faculty of Medicine at Tufts, during a recent FDA meeting

How to run against the wind

Pero, Why does Johnson & Johnson not appear to be doing well in preventing liver infections?

Hay algunas respuestas possibilities. By a lad, Johnson & Johnson’s investigative investigations have claimed a mayor’s degree of failure. Are you realizing the latest from Pfizer’s Moderna, once one of the variants of the virus has been extended more extensively. The variant appears to cause a mayor number of live cases of COVID-19 between the persons evacuated and the original virus.

In the second place, Johnson & Johnson only has one vacancy, while Moderna and Pfizer have ten.. This is about all about the potential of Johnson & Johnson’s vacancy. The initial tests will demonstrate proportion Impressive levels of immunity after a single injection, while the others require a referee, as explained to me by Dr. Robert Wachter, director of the Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.

I love it all vacancies appear to have a significant protection during an injection. (Mire a Gran Bretaña, que no se apresura a dar segundas inyeccions y donde los casos y las muertes siguen cayendo en picado). In the same way, the three vacancies can benefit from a second injection.

Recognize that it can be done that some people are anxious to receive the Johnson & Johnson unit unit, but it will not be necessary. If other data suggest that a second Johnson & Johnson injection series is available, the regulators can change their recommendation. In any case, the COVID-19 vacancies can then return to normal in the future.

What is the conclusion? A sole injection from Johnson & Johnson can allow a slightly higher number of COVID-19 cases than those injected by Moderna or Pfizer. It is difficult to be safe. It does not matter.

“The number that deberia importers to all values ​​is the probability that I am contagious this thing and I really want to kill the woman”, Dijo Wachter. Despite some of the three vacancies, he added, “essentially there is no possibility of killing Covid, the one who is impressive”.

Una reflection final

As the mayor of the stadiums, todavía nee my hy vacunado. Examine the differences between the vacancies, confess that you have a selfish thought: Tal vez la exagerada preoccupation par Johnson & Johnson signifique haran esperar sus dosis y yo podré vacunarme antes.

Si es así, diré que sí, sin dudarlo, and my sentivi aliviado.

Mientras tanto, ofrezco este consejo a qualquiera que esté delante mí en la cola: If you turn up and take Johnson & Johnson’s vacancy, accept what you correspond. I do not know that the perfect one is equal to the equal of good.

Ayer, Iowa: Gov. Kim Reynolds and State Public Health Director Kelly García received Johnson & Johnson’s vacancy during a news conference. “I am very happy to have received”, the governor said, “ysI would like to invite one more time to Iowa residents who, when it comes to opportunity, aprovechen ”.

© The New York Times 2021

SEGUIR LEYENDO: