(CNN Español) – This domicile electoral authority informs that Guillermo Lasso, the candidate of the CREO alliance, passed the second round of the presidential election and will be April 11 with Andrés Arauz, the dolphin of Rafael Correa. Lasso stuvo en Conclusions de CNN en Español para exponer el carino de cara a la segunda vuelta y referirse a la cuestionamientos que se han hecho in electoral process par yande Yaku Pérez del movimiento Pachakutik (tercero en la contienda), quien denuncia fraud.
“I’m the first one interested in clarifying that the (electoral) process is transparent,” said Lasso to Fernando del Rincón.
Lasso sees in the results «an opportunity to lead a great national dialogue and creates that« triumphs democracy ». Dice that understand with absolute clarity that the gates need to be abridged to include distinct distinctions in the suites. Of these, only 32,600 voted separately from Yaku Pérez, the third most voted candidate.
Let’s say that the revision of the listed acts of deliberate form — as the Yaku Pérez plant — was written, is not being exemplified in this case. Yaku Pérez’s argument — as it was the week before Fernando del Rincón — is that in 2017, when Lasso lost the election in these cases, the same Lasso called the revision of selected acts. “The proclamation of results has been given: we are in the second world”, Lasso replied, adding: “Every circumstance is distinct”.
Yaku Pérez’s speech did not change. It is said that electoral results are proclaimed “fraudulent” and that fraud is found “in the information technology system” of comics. It was added that it would be a step in the right direction.
Second place in Ecuador, ¿en riesgo?
Although the second electoral roll in Ecuador is closed, its concession could be huge. The Fiscalia announced that it was investigating an allegation of electoral fraud committed by the Pachakutik movement.
The Fiscalia announced that the approval of the National Court of Justice to grant to the servants who acted and the investigator to any person, among them, the members of the Electoral National Council.
After collecting the digital content from the data base, the Fiscalia says that there is a forensic information tool. Without embargo, the electoral mission of the OEA signaled in its information that it had a preoccupation with “institutions that have an obstacle to electoral function and the correct electoral process”.
This is the same argument with some of the CNE’s advisers and candidates Lasso and Arauz, recounting this type of tax action.
The investigations
Cases in parallel with the election of the National Electoral Council on candidates who passed the second term, announcing that an investigation was being launched into superstitious electoral fraud related to the classification as “anomalies in the February 7 digital information release” .
Fiscalía argues that its investigation requires the retention of the data base of the Electoral National Council and that to proceed, dicen, according to the authorization of the National Court of Justice. Without embarrassment, the body declares these things: one, which does not deal with an encroachment and two, that the legal dilemma “does not interfere in any way in the electoral process in the market”.
This is an investigation under the auspices of the Ecuadorian General Contralor, an organization that has also announced that it will hold an “information audit before it reaches the second round” electoral next April 11 between the candidates Andrés Arauz of the UNES y Lasso coalition. The announcement of these investigations is true that these are political rivals —Arauz and Lasso— related to algo in common. Ambos han tildado de injerencia estas acciones.
In his Twitter account Arauz dijo: “In accordance with the Code of Democracy and the Constitution, there is a single electoral authority and we will completely abstain from interference and the greater intrusion of other functions of the State into the electoral function.
In accordance with the Code of Democracy and the Constitution, there is a single electoral authority and we will review with absolute certainty the interference and the greater intrusion of other functions of the State into the election function. #GolpeALaDemocracia pic.twitter.com/uWQquAtaI4
– Andrés Arauz (@ecuarauz) 21 February 2021
Lasso, in a similar line, points out: “It is important to note that the competent authority within the process is the Electoral National Council. It is not a matter of moments, defending a person or particular interests. It is time to defend and defend democracy ».
It is important to note that the competent authority within the process is the Electoral National Council.
It is not a matter of moments, defending a person or particular interests.
It is time to defend and defend democracy.
– Guillermo Lasso (@LassoGuillermo) 21 February 2021
In addition, in Conclusions, Lasso states that “the law states that in the electoral period the maximum authority is the CNE”, and that it is “unusual” that other organisms such as the Contraloria and the Fiscalia intervene in the form in which he has.
Lasso signaled that “hay que pasar la pagina”, in his opinion. “I am interested in being clarified, but also that the denunciations be presented with documentation”, he said. “We can not follow up with the health of ‘fraud, fraud, fraud’, because Ecuador has the future”.
But there is more to the political line, there is the palate of experts.
An information from the Election Observation Mission of the Organization of American States also shows the preoccupation with these actions. Dicen: “The mission considers that, during an electoral process, its electoral organs must debenum the competencies involved in the election. It agrees that “the mission and preoccupation with the other public entities or authorities claim to have functions that can affect the allocations of the electoral bodies and the proper election and generate, with them, possible interference in the process normative property of the country ».
As far as Fiscalía is concerned, the prosecution has said that its petitions are being marketed in the light of the reality that there is no choice but to have a big rumbo on the ballot box.
Who has applauded these actions is the candidate Pérez, who says that the decision of the Tax Office will serve to transparent the electoral process.
With information from Fernando del Rincón, Kay Guerrero and Ana María Cañizares