(CNN) – For many Republican senators, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, he has no doubts: President Donald Trump’s impotent deletion.
It should be noted that McConnell and at least 16 other Republicans condemn Trump for saying that the charge is another completely different question.
“I have no sympathy for the Republican Senate Conference by Trump,” said a Republican source familiar with internal discussions. “All are listed for this term. But he has a question really aborted about the number of people who will vote to consider a time that he has expired on his mandate ».
MIRA: Trump calls for unconstitutionality to avoid political juicing
Various facts of the Republican Party’s high rank on CNN’s show that many Republicans are divided on whether Trump’s actions justify the precedents of banning volver to occupy the cargo despot of leaving Casa Blanca next week.
Republicans say that, as a last resort, a combination of factors is at stake: the case is being pursued by the House of Representatives’ political juicers, as it provides new information about Trump and the Capitol’s lethal motive and emotions. when it’s time to vote, to determine whether Republican Romans will file and terminate with Trump’s political career.
Privately, Republicans have reviewed the internal polls that show that Trump’s support is accumulating among Republican voters since the day of the elections, especially since last week when inciting a violent turmoil in their constituencies in the United States. what provoked the death of five people, dijeron dos fuentes.
However, including the fact that the cargo is empty, it is likely that there will be a significant influence with the Republican base, as well as the Republicans who promote the election, and possible primary rivals will be obliged to fight.
In general, Republicans are divided into two camps. Some, like Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, oppose the procedures because, arguably, it is constitutionally necessary to give a president a vote that gives the cargo a position that many Republicans are destined to take.
“Dudo that we should have a juice for a president, that is what we are talking about here,” said CNN’s Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota.
MIRA: ANALYSIS | The second historic Trump political juiciness is about Biden and the Republicans
Others, like Sen. Carolina Scott of the South of the South, are likely to align themselves with many Republicans in the House of Representatives who say the political juicing procedures are more than divisive.
“A political juice vote alone will generate the most audio and will result in a deeply fractured nation,” said Scott, who will be voting for voters in 2022 this week.
Without embarrassment, some Republicans say it is fundamental to establish a marketer to make it clear that Congress will not allow future presidents to follow Trump’s campaign, and that Presidential actions will clear a line that no one should repeat.
“I believe that this president has committed a procedural offense,” said Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski at the Alaska KTUU television station, adding that the Senate series “appropriated” the ban on taking over the cargo.
“I believe that it is one of the most important actions that we will take, and we believe that it is seriously appropriate.”
In a statement to the Jews, Murkowski said that he would “carefully listen” to the arguments he had taken before taking a decision on his vote, but said that the Chamber was acting “with speed, and faith, appropriately with political justice”.
McConnell, for his part, has said in private to his colleagues that it is genuinely indecisive and that he will open the mind to listen to the arguments presented by the guarantors of the Democratic political justice of the Chamber, other people familiar with the matter. I want to say that the passions of the moment are free and they say that the juice will fail unless they adopt a position that, according to many, will be the key to influence the Republican votes of the Senate and determine whether Trump is acceptable.
“There is no difference in the (Republican) conference from which there are potentially procedural issues here,” said the first Republican source. “Creo que casi todo el mundo cree eso”.
Hecho, many are being very critical of Trump’s comments to his party members in the middle of last week’s speech of the Capitol.
“In any case, in a very emotional situation, a very inappropriate action on the part of persons appearing to be partisans,” said Sen. Mike Rounds, a Republican from the South Dakota, when the Capitolians were attacked.
Republican senators, who are running for office in Washington, have been holding jail for some time, and will remain silent until further notice. More than a dozen Republican officials in the Senate declined to comment on the solicitation of comments from the Jews regarding the Chamber’s approval of a political juicing article, which accused Trump of inciting a reprimand and reprimand by Republic la Cámara.
The democrats sopesan and traerán testigos, planean argumentar meritos constitutional
The Democrats of the Chamber, recognizing that they have agreed at least 17 Republicans to accept the condensate, are beginning to build their case internally.
Among the issues that are being resolved are external testimonies, including the Secretary of State of Georgia, Brad Raffensperger, who interacted with Trump was quoted in the cargo of political juices when the president presided over the Republican electoral officer for ” find »the votes needed to cancel Joe Biden’s victory in the stadium.
“We must answer in the midst of obtaining some answers,” Raskin said on Wednesday night when the question was asked whether he would testify under the auspices of the political court following the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Nancy Pelosi.
Walter Jones, a spokesman for the Georgia State Secretariat, said in a statement that Raffensperger’s other electoral officer, Gabriel Sterling, was trying to testify at the trial.
“Our team is fully focused on the current Georgia General Assembly at this time,” Jones told CNN.
It is hoped that Raskin, a constitutional scholar, will argue that there is a precedent set by the Senate to allow a federal official to take over the cargo, a fundamental case to convene some Republican senators who are in the barrier, and that he hopes that Trump’s defense team argues its action is unconstitutional.
“It is debatable whether the Senate has the unconstitutional authority to deliver a political verdict to a president who is not in the cargo,” said Sen. Pat Toomey, a Republican from Pennsylvania who surged as one of Republican critical principals. of Trump’s postelectoral rhetoric.
MIRA: Trump puts the Nixon talks ahead of the presidency
“If the Senate lives up to its tune, I will be more fully acquainted with my responsibility to consider the arguments of both the Chamber’s administrators and President Trump’s supporters.”
Nunca has had a political juiciness for a president, and Trump’s allies have argued that the Senate does not have the constitutional authority to deliver a sentence to the president once the day is over. The Senate alone has also joined officials in history.
“The Constitution specifically states that the President will be deprived of his cargo in the event of political juicing. No dice el expresidente », says Alan Dershowitz, member of the first legal team of Trump’s political juiciness, ‘n Maria Bartiromo of Fox News. “The Congress does not have the power to prosecute or prosecute a private citizen.”
But various academic academics say that they are not. Stephen Vladeck, CNN’s analyst and professor of law at the University of Texas, wrote in a New York Times diary opinion piece that the Congress accused and judged a war secretary in 1876 when he was fired, and he Senado concludes that he has the power to judge and ex officio.
The Constitution, signaled by Vladeck, states that the Senate’s sentence in cases of prosecution includes the charge of cargo, as well as the “disqualification to occupy and enjoy any cargo of honor, trust or luxury in the United States”.
“This last clause is the key, because it demonstrates that the Senate has two decisions that take place in political juicing cases: first, it must decide whether a civil servant should be appointed,” Vladeck wrote. “It must be decided whether this person should be disqualified from occupying a future federal cargo. Hecho, of the officials that the Senate voted to vote, the Senate voted to dismiss only three of them, which refuses that the decision and the termination are separate consultations ».
McConnell, in his statements regarding the proximity of the juices, did not suggest that he create an unconstitutional series or that he try not to detain the juices for his reasons. As of now, Republicans, including McConnell, can finally influence the arguments and may end up with Trump’s status as president as a reason to not vote for condemnation.
In a note obtained by CNN establishing the chronogram for political juicing, McConnell questioned whether the juicing should be realized. But he raised a question that he did not have a clear answer: if the President of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, presided over him in Trump’s first political trial.
“When a President is summoned by the Senate, the Constitution requires that the President of the Supreme Court preside over the judgment. The Rules of Procedure of the Senate require that the Senate invite the President of the Supreme Court to assist the Senate and preside over the judgment, “McConnell wrote. “Normally, this invitation is issued on the 19th of January. However, it is not clear if the President of the Supreme Court will preside over the verdict that President Trump will have as President on January 20.