the interview would be a media bomb

(CNN) – Thousands of television stations around the world are aware of this domination while waiting for the transmission of Oprah Winfrey’s interview with the principle of Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

The stellar event, which is broadcasting dominoes by night in the United States, has been promoted inconveniently by the CBS cadence and is set to deliver on the brink of frustration and quarrels over the institution that abandons the year .

“It will not be possible to hope that after all this time we will be silent if there is an active paper that La Firma has to perpetrate forgeries about us”, Meghan said in a video posted, indicating that this is a list to intensify a verbal battle between her and the family with what is casu.

The insatiable British sensationalist has been speculating for a long time that Meghan is feeling restrained by the Palacio antes and has been accused of harassing Harry in 2018, that the couple is having sex with some of his family and that his decision to marry him has caused a lot break with the rest of the clan.

These theories will certainly be tested in the interview, giving viewers a first official relationship after years of palace intrigue.

“It’s really liberating to have the right and the privilege, in some way, to be able to do so” in the interview, Meghan said in an adelanto, discussing the limitations of dealing with the media while working as a member of reality. “Quiero decir … estoy lista par hablar.”

It is hoped that the interview will draw millions of spectators to the home.

Another generational challenge for the Palace

In order to sell the sun in the United Kingdom on Monday, the public will have a new perspective on the ancient members of the realm about the machinations of the palace.

This week, he has seen a frenzy of stories that cited real anonymous and commentary sources, but the Palace has adhered to its habitual silence protocol prior to speculative information that permeates the transmission.

On embarrassment, the firefighters announced that they were investigating allegations that Meghan intimidated staff members, advertising anonymous forms in a British periodical that the Sussex spokesman described as “a defamation-calculated campaign.”

“It is no coincidence that the distorted accusations of varying years have been destined for society and the Duchy has been informed by the British media a little before that she and the Duke have been open and honest about their Experiences from the past. .

The domino for the moon, the portraits of British periodicals are centered in the transmission that is avecinaba, and some inform that the reindeer is not staring. The Mail on Sunday presented in its post a real source that criticized the public interest in the program, dedicating 11 pages to a preview of the interview.

Meghan about Buckingham: Now you can talk about me 1:20

Hours before the interview, the reindeer and other members of the real estate show were broadcast on its most traditional television broadcast; the monarch pronounced a discourse during a special pragrabado of the Commonwealth Day the domingo for the late, donde habo about the coronavirus pandemic and praise the evacuation of vacancas.

For the most desperate television special ever in reality, with the principle of Philip, the queen of 99 years of the kingdom, spending a third week in the hospital, having had some cardiac procedure the Jews.

But the reality is likely to be separate from the story the impact that the television show will have. The palace encounters with a bomb that the dice all about a time per generation; a 1970 interview with the abbot King Eduardo VIII in Wallis Simpson planted problems for the palace, 25 years ago that tens of millions of people saw the “Panorama” confessional of Princess Diana in the United Kingdom.

It seems that the conversation of the Sussex Sea Tan Unique is a continuous proximity to the monarchy (Harry is the sixth in the line of succession to the throne) and its unbelievable popularity, which he began to search for charlatans and lucrative acts with the means of communication.

Pero his movements have the fecha dejan in clear that the connoisseurs of the palace no son his unique objects. It is probable that the couple guards his words for the British sensationalist media, which he pursues without descent for years.

“Everybody knows how to be a British prince … and he destroys my mental health,” Harry and James Corden said in a television appearance last month. “I thought, ‘It’s toxic’, so that hice lo which haria any esposo and any padre: necesito sacar a mi familia de aquí».

The couple in one of their last real compromises the past year.

The couple has been involved in multiple legal cases against publications and photography agencies that reveal details of their private lives.

In this year’s principles, Meghan filed a privacy complaint against the editors of the Mail on Sunday when he published a card that he sent to his father, and launched a reprimand to “dehumanize” the media after the verdict, diciendo que «el daño que han hecho y continúan haciendo es profundo».

“Has been incredibly difficult for us both, but at least we are holding one another”, said Harry and Winfrey in another promotional segment, establishing parallelism between his experience and that of his mother, Princess Diana who also married in the 1990s.

The door will be closed to a possible recovery of the couple as members of the real estate in the principles of this year.

But this announcement includes an enrollment envelope; Harry and Meghan’s statement that “universal service” was widely seen as a repression of the rigidity of the Palacio events, even though the Queen confirmed that “the ally of the Real Family work, it is not possible to continue with responsibilities and needs that come with a wide range of public service ».

Nonetheless, the interview means that you can start advertising the narrative on your real division, free up the middle of your mediated compromises in your election and sculpt your new lives as famous activists.

Source