Washington, United States.
El Tribunaal Supremo de Estados Unidos This month’s decision is based on the case of former President Donald Trump, who has been able to block Twitter users from considering “irrelevant” because the executor has abandoned the power.
El Supremo dio carpetazo a a case that started in 2017 and that part of his sentiment when Twitter permanently suspends Trump’s entry this past, through the passage of his followers to the Capitol, so that he could have precedents about how he can use the social speeches the people are in power.
The highest judicial body in the country has yet to revoke Trump’s decision to arrest Trump on his behalf, including one of the court’s juvenile conservatives must show favor in evaluating the preoccupations of the president’s party about the power of this and other social media companies.
Legal doctrines
“Soon we will have another option to address the issue of how our legal doctrines apply to information infrastructure Highly concentrated and private property, like digital platforms “, wrote the magistrate Clarence Thomas.
La decision of the Supreme of this unanimous and orderly declaration of nullity, by “irrelevant”, the fall of a court of appeals with a seat in New York, which concluded in 2019 that Trump had no right to block users from his Twitter account.
The case commenced in July 2017, when the Instituto Ridder for the First University of Columbia University (New York) eis’ n Trump en nombre de siete usuarios de la red social a los que el presidente había bloqueado.
The defendants argue that the mandate uses its personal account (@realDonaldTrump) to pay Gobierno official information, for which his debited messages are accessible to all the world.
La Corte de Apelaciones del Segundo Circuito afsluiting en 2019 que Trump había violado al blocear esas cuentas la primera enmienda de la Constitución estadounidense, which guarantees the freedom of expression, because it is a public official who uses his speeches with official fines.