One will discuss the receipt all of it passed to Taylor Swift, perdio el trabajo que realizo en sis primros ses albumen que la catapultaron al exito, sin embargo, al alzar la voz y visibilizar lo que sucede dentro los cellos discograficos, se convertio un una de las pocas artistas que logr to do what you want.
Andrea Pastoor, advocate and specialist in entertainment and musical industry law, explains that Swift, which is currently a company with Universal music jw.org af EU, will be due to its masters at the end of its contract, even if it deals with a disc company that requires a license or temporary authorization to use its songs.
“When the company with Universal Dice: ‘to make a victim, renounce my past and be for my future’, because of his disco Lover she has two of all, this is a question without precedents, only artists like she logran make this type of contract ”.
También lee: Taylor Swift releases album “Fearless” to recover the rights
But, what happened to Taylor?
Agreed with Pastor, who works in Capitol Records, a self-titled Universal Music Group discordographic property owned by Taylor firm with them, commented that in the world of the discs, by a drawer, are the author’s rights to the lyrics and music of the songs, and by the other, the interpretation, which in the argument is denominated master.
“When firms have a discographical contract, in the state of the industry, the discourse can do whatever it takes, all the interpretations, serenity of the disc, enthos all these albums of one of Taylor’s (the masters) son of Big Machine Records, with whom firm when empezó his career.
“For the sake of music and lyrics, Taylor signed with Sony / ATV Music Publishing. The controversy surged with the discourse that had its masters ”.
300 MILLION DOLLARS was the sale of the masters of his first six discs.
All empezó, dice, cuando Swift vestig die concluir su contrato met Big Machine Records, cuyo dueño era Scott Borchetta; to follow up with her, she pissed that he regained the title of master and said that she, always and when she made a new contract, and by each new album she launched, she regressed one.
Pero Taylor dijo: ‘nee, gracias, mejor me voy con otra disquera’ y así firmó Universal. ‘
La abogada explica que luego Big Machine Records is available by Scooter Braun, a stranger Taylor acusó de haberle hecho bully.
También lee: Taylor Swift is in trouble, park the request to use the number “evermore”
“For this she had a double problem: that she could not recover the property of her masters and that she would sell her work to a person with whom she could not live”.
By the way, Scooter sold Taylor’s Shamrock Holdings talks to more than $ 300 million, the adviser said.
But now that he has won the contract with Big Machine Records, he is free to play his discs without Scooter, he has to be a duo of his productions, he can only use the right of the lyrics and the music.
“Taylor is blocking and all this people of his antiquity are discovering who is related to their master passages”, agrees the lawyer.
#Escucha The best of Taylor Swift, the singer who took a war on his rights https://t.co/cGAuiMcqBN pic.twitter.com/BarUwPQwVO
– Univ_Espectaculos (@Univ_espect) 20 February 2021
OTROS PLEITOS POR SUS SANCIONES
Prince also changed his name to Love Symbol in the 90s when he played with Warner. In 2014 he recovered the rights on his catalog. 
Bob Dylan perdio los derechos de varias canciones, entre ellas “Blowin ‘in the wind”, cuando la disquera vendió el catálogo a Michael Jakson.
Paul McCartney sufrió to recover the rights of his songs; it was inverted that by singing “Hey Jude” it would pay off.