Washington (CNN) – The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in favor of a lower court, saying that President Donald Trump’s violations are the first thing to do, following his Twitter account.
The Supreme Court has ruled that Trump’s case is not the president’s, because there is no such thing as a live or controversial case.
Trump took the lead on Twitter in 2009, and in May and June 2017, he resigned as president, blocking the presence of people who expressed their displeasure with him.
The lawyers at the Knight Institute of the First Elementary School, Columbia University, questioned the number of people, arguing that Trump’s action violated the rights of the First Elementary School.
In the judicial documents, it is said that the president’s account, @realDonaldTrump, “functions as an official source of remarks and information about the Gobierno, and as a forum for the president’s discourse, ante and about the fault”.
A district court said that the action of the presidents to block the violators following the rights of the First Amendment because individuals exclude a public forum based on points of view, a decision that the law confirms a court of appeal.
The attorney general, Jeff Wall, pleaded guilty to the Supreme Court’s charge against the case, arguing that Trump’s account was personal, including that he was manipulating Dan Scavino’s assessor.
“Ignore the critical distinction between official declarations [a veces] of the President on Twitter and his decision always to block the inquiries of his own account “, argued Wall, the opinion of the lower court” divide the line between the state action and the private conduct to pesar the repetitions and recent exhortations of this Take care to pay attention to this line in applying the First Entry ».
But after the elections and when Twitter excluded Trump from the platform for violating his policies related to the insurgency of the Capitol of the United States, Wall has joined the Court in deciding the case and burying the tribunal’s opinion.