Due to its political and social ambitions, Venezuela is a nation divided into two very different parts. The South American country has been politically polarized for the past 20 years and socioeconomic inequality has always been more important.
There are no oppositions and chavists alone, so the reality is more tangible than that of the social classes. A majority that finds itself in extreme poverty that, according to various studies, accounts for 80% of the population, and a small group that can access “privileges”.
Economists and politicians are in this ultimate sector as an “elite” group that is becoming more and more volatile, while others are signaling that they are leaving the rest of a media class that, as far as it goes, to disappear and have no official dates, because geen son publishes the entries without having a proper definition.
¿THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE MEDIA CLASS?
Following the most recent study on the Venezuelan media class, published last February by the consultancy firm Anova Policy Research, the real premise of the realm of this sector of society, “Independentemente” of the definition of the concept that is used, has taken place more than 70% as of 2010.
“And today, approximately 9 out of 10 families considered by the media class in the principle of the decade are not here”, summarizes the document of the company that uses various concepts to define, between them a study of the World Bank of 2011 that consider in this sector as water that has a degree that the permit protects against negative events and with a degree of economic stability.
This theory states the lower umbrella of initials at $ 10 per day and the superior at $ 50, adjusted by the parity of the purchase power. According to these and the data of the company, the percentage of population living with this level of increments increased from 62.0% in 2010 to 15.5% in 2020.
The consultant states that in order to read the conclusion of the “abrupt and sustainable” chain of the media class, a merger of various theories and inquiries of NGOs in Venezuela on higher levels and signal that erosion for this sector started in 2013 with the “shock de los ingresos “.
Since that year, Venezuela has been embroiled in a period of economic contraction that experts in the area advocate the policies implemented by the failed President Gobierno Hugo Chávez (1999-2013) and continue with his successor Nicolás Maduro.
The economist and executor Ángel Alvarado has taken over these policies in three: the destruction of economic rights (the minimum wage has been lower than one dollar, the expropriation of companies and with it the disappearance of employees), the sobreendeam of destruction the petroleum industry.
The media class “basically destroys when it destroys jobs and destroys jobs when the economy enters into an economic contraction”, Alvarado said, defining this “disappearance” sector in Venezuela.
LA DISPARIDAD
In the Caribbean, there are large-scale sectors in which the crisis appears non-existent. The eye of a few new bargains, the sale of imported products and vehicles to train – a paralyzed industry from now on – is a model of this sector of society that has privileges.
Its persons who, in addition, have access to divisions have a better quality of services, except that they fall to the national level. Your purchasing power allows you to fight the light bulbs with electric plants, pay a water truck to find the fault of this resource or a more stable internet service that the State offers.
But it is necessary to have the necessary strength to combat the strains of the crisis, its conditions of quality of life are also affected, and there are inevitable situations that arise with money.
The other large sector can hardly access any of these “privileges”. According to data from the Survey of Conditions of Life (Encovi), which realizes universities in the country, 80% of the population is in extreme poverty.
The empty studio has the minimum level of population, nutrition, services, education, employment or living conditions, among others.
These people can not afford to have a basic food canteen and much less to consume proteins, tales like red cabbage or chicken, and need to burn water, water, gas or internet.