Republican Senator Explains why he changed his vote in Donald Trump’s political trial

The Democratic Party, which is pushing for a political verdict against former President Donald Trump, is ready to issue a condolence vote in the Senate, but this March, on the formal initiation of impeachment, consiguió que otro congressista republicano una a sus filas en la votaion that decision on whether the process is constitutional, lie of an allegation made by the lawyer of the ex-mandate.

The vote of Bill Cassidy was the only one with respect to the previous vote, when the Republicans intended to delay the process. There are, among others, five other “moderate” congressmen who have voted online with the 50 Democrat senators: Ben Sasse, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney and Pat Toomey.

The last week’s ambient thermometer in the Senate reflects the chances of a condolence against Trump, which has 67 votes in favor. Es decir, convener a 17 republicanos.

Of all forms, Cassidy explained that he changed his vote for the extra presentation of Donald Trump’s defense. ‘Fue disorganizado, aleatorio”, Cassidy commented on the allegation. ‘Hablaron de manyas cosos pero ne hablaron del tema en cuestión, Is the constitution impugnar to a president who gave the cargo? ”. In exchange, I congratulate the heads of the Chamber of Representatives, who hold the function of taxation: “We will present a convincing and convincing case, and the president’s team will not be there ”.

Cassidy said at the time that he was one of Trump’s lawyers, inclined to ask Sen. Ted Cruz (Republican of Texas) if he was making any allegations, much to his dismay.

‘If there is such a thing as an impartial judgment, respecting my jurisdiction to defend the Constitution of the United States, and one part has the argument, and the other has all the right to make the argument, there are agreements to be approved, there are agreements to vote”, Agregó Cassidy. “Always say that afronto is like an impartial law”.

El abogado Bruce Castor, who represents Trump together with the letter David Schoen, made a speech during the first day of the political juices that included surrepressive eulogies in the Democratic fiscal, and argued that the presentation of the cause was “well done”.

Descolled by the description of a “sobresaliente” exhibition, Recognition that the defense is obliged to change its strategy with respect to what tenies are expected to expose during the session.

Conscious of the Democrats not having the votes to condemn Trump in the term of the verdict that took place this March, Castor protagonist has a disorderly order and incoherent rates, as if to say that the powder will not influence the outcome of the process.

Related Searches for Trump Filter on the Press Castor’s objective was to “change the temperature” through the current discourse of Jamie Raskin, but what the protagonist does is a divisive unraveling rhetoric, in which he mixes alabaster to the senators with extraneous and inconsistent references. “The United States senators have their extraordinary talent, in a technical sense”, said Castor at the start of his 48-minute speech.

Castor’s name has been tweaked on Twitter for when his partner David Schoen deleted the relevant one.

Inform the CNN cadena, which cite sources close to the ex-mandate, Trump “casi estaba gritando mientras Castor” presents his arguments. However, even if the President disapproves of the initial action of his defense team, his staff is confident that his action is being taken to carry out his action.

Other senators like Trump’s allies also criticized Castor. “Hy het visto muchos abogados y muchos argumentos, pero lo de Castor no es de lo mejor que he visto. It is not enough to divide one and another time and do not abort the argument, ”said John Cornyn. For his part, Ted Cruz, consulted on the subject, kept silent for a few seconds, and responded with a resounding: “I do not believe that the lawyers have the most effective work. Dejaré que sean otros los que pongan las notas ”.

Trump’s attorneys said a week ago in the case, Trump dismissed his team earlier by not agreeing on the strategy. The Republican insists on the theories about a presumed fraud, stating that the indictment is not about the elections, but about inciting violence in the attack on the 6th Capitol.

The political juiciness is being retaliated against in the 12 (local time, 17 GMT), when empezarán the underlying arguments of the “tax” of the “impeachment”, which has a maximum of 16 hours and the length of sessions to expose its case, antes of which read the turn of the defense.

Dos fuentes cercanas a Trump citadas par CNN aseguran que el ex mandatario, elunico mandatario en afrontar dos impeachment en la historie de EEUU, no va a aapirer publisemente hastta du final de juicio, aunque está hablando con sus asesores sober puirar resir Republicans in the next elections, the mid-term elections.

(With EFE information)

MORE ABOUT THIS THEME:

Mientras comenzaba el juicio politico, la junta de Palm Beach seunion para decir si Donald Trump puede vivir en Mar-a-Lago

Take over the second political juiciness against Donald Trump