President Donald Trump is absolutely right in a political trial, by the second time | News Univision Politica

The surprise in the second political juice against Donald Trump was not in the final result: his desperation. The surprise took place in a drama of the last hour, the number of Republicans uniting the Democrats to condemn the president and, in particular, in the duration and contradictory final message of the leader of the Republican bank against the accused.

It is the political juice vote in which he voted for the mayor’s candidacy of senators of the accused party, more than the ones who voted originally sanctioning the constitutionality of the process, which was questioned by his defense.

And by 2020, Mitt Romney has the environment and the first senator to vote against the leader of his party in a political juicio. This time, Romney was accompanied by another 6 colleagues.

In this way, Trump, with his disgraceful brand of counting a bipartisan vote against him in a Judeo-Judgment (even if he fails 10 to condemn) and, in addition, is the only president of EU history to have someday two times the ‘impeachment’ by the Congress of the current acts in the ownership of its governor. All in a solo mandate.

“I do not believe that President Trump is morally responsible and practically responsible for the events (of January 6)”, said the leader of the Republican minority, Mitch McConnell, who voted in favor of the accused, in his final message In the plenum of the Senate, all the same arguments were raised that raised the accusation, but against the two courts voted for only minutes before.

McConnell cheated on Trump by not “having a hard time working” while the staff was safe and assured that the mandated entities “were going (the events) happy on television”.

There was a message for many contradictory people. Particularly because of a procedural detail that the Kentucky senator argued: that the Senate received the accusation that Trump was not president. But it is debatable that he, like the former head of the Camera Alta, decided not to summon the senators so that he could receive the ‘impeachment’ that the representatives had approved.

At the end of his statement, McConnell practically invited that there should be a trial in Trump, which, then, is a “special city”.

Following McConnell’s parade and the number of Republicans who are considered Trump’s culprits, the final result of the Senate’s conviction, which was recorded at a record time of 5 days with the presentation of arguments of the accusation ( 13 hours, approximately) and defense (3 hours and media).

For some reason, this Saturday shows that the process will be extended to what it is predisposed to, when the plenum approves the solicitation of the administrators of the testimony to testify to Congressman Jaime Herrera-Butler.

Finally, an agreement was reached between the parties to include a testimony from the Republican congressman of Washington, who made sure that the leader of his bank, Kevin McCarty, accounted for the death of Trump as he was willing to help the Capitol and burl of the risky situation that the congressists are experimenting with.

I abreast of the fact that the parties will have more testimonies and documents, which may have extended the process by days or weeks, which were just what neither Democrats nor Republicans wanted.

Since the accusation of ‘impeachment’ has been lodged with the Senate, it is clear that the 67 necessary votes for a condensate will not be registered. Only six Republicans consider that the constitutional process when voting at the point of the first day of the trial.

Although many members of the Republican Party have held Trump accountable for violating the 6th year’s viola realized by his sympathizers, we have not been able to convert him into the first presidential condemnation.

Trump’s weight inside the party is a notoriously notorious notion that he has to deal with the legion of followers with what he has and will be necessary to win future elections.

With the positions taken, the week of the process is more like a proselytizing ping-pong exercise.

The accusation was made by politicians representing the Democratic Party; in defense only has abogados without known political activity.

Without embarrassment, Trump’s defenders will use a rhetoric that at the moment resonates with the Republican presidential campaign and appears to be reproducing messages from the presidential presidential campaign.

“It’s so much more than President Trump,” said Bruce Castor, the defense attorney’s defense attorney, who the first day of the trial had produced a large statement with an extra speech that surprised many lack of legal and narrative focus.

“His goal is to eliminate a political opponent, to increase his opinion on the will of the voters (…) This judgment is much more than that Trump (busca) criminalizes points of view of politics, that it is actually making this judgment”, conclusion Castor.

The Democrats are arguing for the need to protect the democratic system with an exemplary condition.

“We are here to cast Trump, we are here to prevent the audio of the audio that sembro does not flourish,” said Diana DeGette, in a statement.

The administrators of the House of Representatives ensure that the attack on the Congress’ congress is the final logic of a process that the president has been cultivating since the election campaign with his violent rhetoric and the diffusion of mentions about the electoral process. It was not a spontaneous event, nor did it matter if it was worth the heat of the day.

There was an explosion of a rabies that has been accumulating since last months, when Trump emphatically denounced a superstition fraud with the votes in favor of the pandemic, amplified in close quarters, and exacerbated by the November 3 rally. Presidente reconciles the victory of Joe Biden arguing that the habían “robbed” the elections.

It’s what Democrat administrators are calling Trump’s Great Money. The intention, according to its explanations, was to make it clear that the transfer of power to Joe Biden, frustrating the last event in the electoral calendar that was the bicameral session of the Congress in which the result of the Electoral College’s certificate was obtained.

The defense of the former president recognizes that his words are the detonant of those events and defend the right to the freedom of expression of the president. To note, we present videos edited by Democratic leaders using phrases similar to “lucha” and “playing with the demon” that Trump used in his speech at Casa Blanca’s hours before talking about the sympathy of his sympathizers.

Although many of the retirees in their videos are looking to establish a “false equivalence” in the context of their phrases, with a shocking repetition of the phrase “lucha”, the strategy was to demonstrate that our first democrat politicians are protected of the Constitution, like Trump. In other words, they are guilty of inciting violence, appearing to be the fundamental argument.

The administrators of the accusation approve that the senators conformed to the jurisprudence of the trial would also testify and testify at the event in order to personalize it to the maximum, make it initial and the posterior indignation that the congressmen will have, many of them.

The Democrats will show vandalism videos that entonaban cantics against Vice President Mike Pence pending his “hearing” on the search of Nancy Pelosi, presented by the Chamber of Deputies, on which variants ”And messages and social reasons.

“The vice president is blushing because he refuses to return the results of the elections,” said Representative Stacey Plaskett, one of the administrators who showed diagrams showing the attackers would be only 100 pieces from where Pence was staying. su familia estaban resguardados.

But the strategy is not agreed, even if it is agreed. Various Republican senators would be “condemned” and “impacted” by what was heard and listened to and by the record of the violence of that day, but this does not mean that students have been guilty of it to the president, that it was the intention of the jury.

The arguments of both parties in the parish are directed more than the recent Senate and the rest of the public opinion

The Democrats, recording the horrors of such an uprising that killed 5 people and killed people and killed the confidant of much of the population in the state political institution. And with a video making Trump’s speeches in decades of public events on the eve of his presidency, which will be unveiled in the midst of January’s White House.

Trump’s defense embodies his client’s style in the defiant tone with which he directs to Senado in a good part of his presentation, insecure for the recent and with inadmissible security in a legal court, and with the use of videos that parecían sacados de un manual de campña elections.

A collection of decontextualized phrases in which the “pelea” or “lucha” phrases are repeated by various democratic busder readers, showing an aggressive style in the edition, demonstrate that they are part of the political vocabulary because they are both .

The lawyer Micheal van der Veen at a moment of the questioning session of the senators of the fours levante the cabeza and as we went more from the living room lamented that “the people of the stadium” (as signaled with the lenses in his mane derecha) not había has the possibility to see a correct process. With this gesture, Van der Veen issued a patent for the message being sent to women who were studying the television broadcast.

In his message at the end of the trial, the leader of the Democratic mayor, Chuck Schumer, hopes that the executor will agree with “the court of public opinion”, that the democrats hope that the arguments presented against Trump.