As with such aunts in the legal texts, the Constitution does not explain much about the political appeals process of a high-ranking official, but rather to say that the Chamber of Representatives is the only one with the power to impeach ‘some’, the Senate it is the only one to be able to prosecute the political juices that are derived and that the ultimate caste will be saccharo del vrag que ocupa.
The case against Trump
Donald Trump called for “impeachment” by the second week before the end of the White House, marking the record for a mandate: accusation of vices by the Congressional Crimes Committee on cargo ownership. And there are two times a year.
Today, five people will be killed, destroyed in the facilities of the Congressional seat, suspended by some during this protocol session and the confidence of many stadiums in the solidarity of democratic institutions.
Under normal conditions, as during Trump’s first political juxtaposition in 2020, there has been no discussion since the president took office. The condition, if any, is related to its destination.
Pero Trump now is the president, a particular citizen with no responsibilities other than those of any other citizen.
Is it unconstitutional that the Senate should not hold Trump’s political juices, if one has anything to do with the presidency?
Response is immediate, but not unique. Sí, sí puede, y no, no puede, todo depende de cómo lea el text which is responding.
