Piers Morgan has been making Meghan Markle for a while now by questioning an allegation she made about her alleged secret marriage to Prince Harry.
Morgan faced a huge setback earlier this month after saying he simply did not believe the allegations of the Duchess of Sussex in an interview with Oprah Winfrey, during which the couple made shocking allegations about the royal family and their working hours. as senior members. Eventually, the broadcast of the set of ‘Good Morning Britain’ stormed off before finally ending his work a day after the interview was broadcast in the UK.
On Monday, TV host Markle further questioned the credibility of Twitter by sharing an article from The Daily Mail on Twitter. The article reports that the couple’s claims that they were married in a private ceremony, days before their lavish royal wedding, were denied by the release of their marriage certificate by the General Registry.
PRINCE HARRY, MEGHAN MARKLE RISK LOSS OF ROYAL TITLES ON OPRAH INTERVIEW: SOURCES
“Do we still have to believe her?” Morgan wrote in a tweet accompanying the article.
The couple claimed during their lengthy, two-hour session with Winfrey that they had been married before their May 19, 2018 ceremony. Harry confirmed in the interview that the ceremony includes only himself, his future bride and the Archbishop of Canterbury, who also hosted their May 19 ceremony.
Although the couple held a personal, private ceremony, it was not an official marriage because it would not meet certain criteria set by the church.
Piers Morgan got Meghan Markle on Twitter another slap on her Oprah Winfrey interview.
(MWE / GC images)
Representatives of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex did not comment when Fox News reached out.
MEGHAN MARKLE REMEMBERS THE FEELING SHE ‘DOESN’T WANT TO LIVE ANY MORE’
The official rule book for clergy presented by the Church of England contains the very specific circumstances for which the Church defines a legal marriage. The book says that ” a couple who are already legally married cannot choose to remarry unless there is doubt about the validity of the previous marriage. ‘
Furthermore, Harry’s statement that the private ceremony took place just below each other, his bride and the archbishop, is another problem. According to the rule book, two or more witnesses must be present at the marriage to consider it legally binding. It is unclear whether the archbishop counts as one of the witnesses.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER
The rules also stipulate that a private, exclusive garden ceremony creates a problem, as the public is expected to have unrestricted access to the building during any wedding ceremony to allow valid objections to the marriage.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The Archbishop of Canterbury’s office had no comment when Fox News reached out to him earlier.