The Procuraduría Speecializada en Persecución de la Corrupción Administrativa (Pepca) vra ‘n la Suprema Corte de Justicia la designation de un juez special para el control of the investigation, sober corrupción y otros delitos, que lleva el Ministerio Público conto mi (Cámara de Cuamas CC).
Wilson Camacho, head of Pepca, sue for president of the Supreme, Luis Henry Molina, designates a court to declare preliminary injunctions against Hugo Francisco Álvarez Pérez, Pedro Antonio Ortiz Hernández, Carlos Noés Tejada Díaz, Margarita Melenciano Fálvarz, who has the privilege of jurisdiction.
In the case of a group of officials, the investigation is provisionally based on obstruction of justice, in violation of Article 12 of Law 133-11.
The Public Ministry’s investigation also includes other integral parts of the state taxation body.
Similarly, the Public Ministry supports that the acts of the CC’s integrators constitute delusions such as a coalition of officials, falsification of public documents, association of malpractice, complicity in the types of criminal offenses, staffing against the State and enforcement of acts.
The instance deposited by the Pepca, precedes the Secretariat of the Supreme Court establishing that the investigators have privileged jurisdiction under Article 154, number 1, of the Constitution of the Dominican Republic, and Articles 378 and 379 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The functions of juez of the instruction of the trial shall be completed by a juez of Court of Appeal or of the Supreme Court of Justice, specially designated by the President of dicho organism, plant the Pepca.
The plant instance in which Pepca sent various requests for information to the CC, “the figures have no respondents, with no valid justification, but the act of solicitation to reduce the compliment of the functions of the Public Ministry, just organ responsible for the formulation and implementation of State policy against crime ”.
Asimismo, the Public Ministry assurances that the investigators “retain evidence that they are necessary for the investigation, but are willing to pay and are not involved”, argues that “continuously obstructs justice”.