The resolution was issued in lieu of a request for an injunction interrupting the ownership of El Faro by a series of claims in the tributary interest filed by the Ministry of Health.
The Ministry of Health will abstain temporarily from requiring Tripod key clause, Anonymous Capital Variable Company (Tripod, SA of CV), owner of El Faro digital periodicals, while finally finalizing an amparation process for the company’s petition and determined if it is more well compromised the freedom of expression and pressure and the rights of the periodicals, ordered the Hall of the Constitutional Court of the Supreme Court of Justice.
In a resolution issued this week, the maximum tribunal orders that “be suspended immediately and provisionally” the requirement of the books of deeds of the Junta Directive of the company, informs the final reports that are between the international cooperatives and the details about the subscribers who make periodic contributions
You may be interested in: Association of Periodicals registers 58 aggression in jornada elections
The decision of the Chamber of Deputies responds with a judgment of amortization promoted by El Faro against the General Directorate, the General Subdirectory in the Department of Criminal Investigation and Normative Tributaries, authorities of the General Directorate of Internal Taxation (DGII) of the Ministry of Health, initiate proceedings in which the tributary conduct of its representative was related to the impositional impositions of the years 2014, 2016, 2017 and 2018.
In the case of Tripod’s lawyers, there is a risk of deregulation of freedom of expression, freedom of information and the self-determination of informative periodicals that owner – or owner of the relevant periods – his work in the media of communication, details that contribute to the same and of the actor company.
“The revelation of the questionable information permitting the Organ Executive Executive conveys aspects of the editorial line and the media investigation, as well as periodic secretaries related to the methodology, sources and collaborators of the El Faro media”, say the allegations.
In addition, it is argued that the private information of the subscribers of the referendum in the middle of the relevant tributary section and should be protected by the provision of sensitive character data.
The Chamber clarifies that this resolution “does not constitute – in any form – an obstacle to the taxation of the public administration of the tributary”, but the object of this process is not to control the taxation procedures in order to be different, Documentation and questioned information have relevant relevance, should be established as – as a consequence of the possible entry of the required – will be in danger of the fundamental rights to the freedom of expression, freedom of information and self-determination
Lea also: Make sure you have no funds for FODES
In February, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights issues The CIDH issues legal protection measures in favor of El Faro digital periodicals and its periodicals in front of the facilities, hostilities, intimidations, as well as criminalization and stigmatization.
The CIDH, one of the principal organs of the Organization of American States (OEA) for the promotion and defense of the human rights, has organized the cautious media in the State of El Salvador considering the “pregnancy, urgency and irreparability” of the hechos, which of these facilities, discrimination, discreditation through state media and other hostilities.
Ante esto, the demand to the governor of Nayib Bukele that adopt the necessary means to preserve the life and integrity of 34 persons who form part of El Faro, as well as to “be able to disable his periodic activities in possession of his right to liberty of expression, without being the object of acts of intimidation, arrangements and hospitality ”.