Jenny Cudd, FBI arrest by the contestant and el asalto al Capitolio of the 6th of January and who submits to social speeches a video on which presumed to have invaded the office of the President of the Chamber of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, has submitted to a federal law that allows him to travel to Mexico for a “route of negotiations”.
Cudd, a Texan who owns a flower shop and initially did not intend to commit a crime by intruding on the federal property to intend to suspend certification of the November 3 elections, said he would work to oblige on the Riviera Maya by “Acquired Compromises with Priority”, as agreed with legal documents obtained by Zoe Tilmna, Buzzfeed News Reporter.
The woman, who has been accused of speaking out against Pelosi’s office and defending “not having anything wrong”, was arrested on February 13 by the FBI. A video that is part of a new, Cudd’s jacket has been released to the public and is enorgullece de que las imagens hubieran sido transmitidas por Fox News.
Ahead of his detention, he assured that “the exaggerated pressure” was on the head of the Poder Legislative seat, which caused five deaths, among them police officer Brian Sicknick, who had received honorary fines at the Capitol Rotunda defending the wall. Sicknick, 42, murders the 7th of January following the legacy of receiving a turf from Trump’s supporters’ golfer in the cage with an extinguisher.
Currently, Cudd (who also intends to compete for a political seat in Midland, Texas) is free of charge and it’s for now that a retreat of four days will take place in the Mexican Caribbean, in accordance with the document presented to them.
Cudd insisted that no such thing was “illegal” when the video went public. But it is illegal to agree with the Department of National Security of the United States, which indicates that women giving federal property should be punished.
One of the lawyers representing Cudd said the plan could be declared “not guilty”, in agreement with CNN. The document giving money to vacation in Mexico indicates that the accusation has complied with the conditions laid down by the tribunal at the moment of providing free property.
