‘Have you heard of the peer-reviewed peer-reviewed study from Stanford University that shows beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely no chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the website of the government’s National Center for Biotechnological Information, ”reports NOQReport.com. “The NCBI is a branch of the National Institutes of Health, so one would think that such a study would be widely reported by the mainstream media and embraced by the ‘scientific’ people in Big Tech. ‘
The study found: “The data suggest that medical and non-medical face masks are not effective for viral and infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID -19.”
Instead, it was revealed that no heritage media had reported on this. For some strange reason, it seems like the media has always wanted to perpetuate the mask myth … as if they like to wear the face mask.
In July 2020, the Globe purchased a cloth mask at a pharmacy in preparation for an airplane trip. This is the warning on the box: “Antimicrobial face mask does not protect users against bacteria, viruses, germs or other disease organisms.” (see photo above)
Just to prove it was a mask story, Twitter suspended former Trump adviser Steve Cortez when he Tweet the study out with his comments:
Twitter has been suspended @CortesSteve for quoting a Stanford NIH study on masks. pic.twitter.com/2y460zkN0Z
– Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) 17 April 2021
The Globe has been questioning the lack of mask science since the spring of 2020 – more than a year ago. We spoke to nearly 20 epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists, various physicians, public health medicine, and medical experts.
Here is an article:
“According to immunologists and epidemiologists, the California Globe surveyed that people should be indoors, schools closed, mandatory masks and social distances ordered, the opposite of what needs to be done for the health and well-being of society. Herd immunity is supposed to be the real health goal, while protecting those who are most vulnerable – in the case of coronavirus, the elderly and disabled are confined to nursing homes. ”
The governor issued an executive order and had his public health department issued a new mandate on Thursday, saying:
‘Over the past four months, we’ve learned a lot about COVID-19 transmission, especially people who are infected but asymptomatic or presymptomatic plays an important role in spreading the community. The use of face masks by all can limit the release of infected droplets during talking, coughing and / or sneezing, as well as removing the physical distance. ”
What was once an order to flatten the curve has turned into ‘people who are infected but asymptomatic or presymptomatic play an important role in spreading the community. ”
And in another article:
California Globe reports Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, professor of medicine and public health at the University of California, Los Angeles, said:
‘I think there is no evidence that wearing a surgical mask has any benefit in protecting anyone in general from exposure or infection. We usually recommend people who are ill to wear surgical masks to prevent transmission [to others]”it may be a kind of awareness-raising tool, but in terms of its immediate benefits, there is no data,” Dr Klausner added.
Dr. Brosseau and and dr. Sietsema, both national experts on respiratory protection and infectious diseases at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said: “We do not recommend that the general public who do not have symptoms of COVID-19-like diseases should regularly wear cloth or surgical masks, as there is no scientific evidence that it effectively reduces the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. ”
Another Globe article found:
“The Centers for Disease Control conducted a pool analysis of ten RCTs examining the impact of face masks on reducing influenza infections within a community,” the California Globe reported in “Why I’m Not Wearing a Mask.” ‘They conclude that these studies have found’ no significant reduction in the transmission of influenza using face masks’. “These studies covered a wide range of environmental conditions from university residences to households, but the results were the same in all of them.”
” There is limited evidence for this [masks] effectiveness in preventing the transmission of influenza viruses, ‘they found. It applies to masks “worn by the infected person for source control OR if worn by uninfected persons.” They unequivocally concluded that there was ‘no significant effect of face masks on the transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza’. “
A Globe article reported in April 2020:
COVID-19 virus is mainly transmitted by humans breathing drops – sneezing and coughing.
Droplet transmission occurs when someone is in close contact with someone who has respiratory symptoms and coughs or sneezes. The breathing drops can then be passed through the mouth and nose, of eyes, if exposed to respiratory droplets that may be contaminated.
This is why many medical experts believe that masks will not prevent exposure to COVID-19, because to wear enough equipment to prevent exposure, you must wear glasses to protect your eyes, as well as a mask that cover the nose and mouth. And it’s still a big maybe.
As one doctor jokingly said, “If cloth underwear can not escape a ship, how can a cloth mask protect against an infectious virus?” While he was funny, his point was that cloth masks are not effective, and are not used in hospitals.
The Stanford study said: “Wearing a face mask mechanically restricts breathing through the resistance to air movement during both inhalation and exhalationcease[12,13]. A long-lasting effect of wearing a face mask can be detrimental to health. ‘
And the Stanford study found that the psychological effects of wearing a face mask are quite negative, as Table 1 shows.
“Follow the science” has new meaning.
Read again ‘The miserable Pseudo-science behind face masks, social distance and contact tracing’, a Globe article in June 2020.
