MIAMI, ESTADOS UNIDOS.-The federal fiscals of New York he converted into the focus of attention and the controversy over reconnaissance haber dicho una “Rotunda mentira” to the defense attorneys of a criminal prosecution, while intending to remain important in the trial of the defendants in the failed trial of a prosecutor accused of violating the United States’ sanctions against Iran.
This tax evasion is one of the many allegations against Honduran capos and politicians, vinculados a carteles del narcotrafica.
Communication media like the Washington Post and ABC News there is an echo of what is considered a scandal that evidence of the manipulation of a juice. The periodical history surge lies that the agency se notices AP soliciting documents of a particular case.
According to the media, these are “the most important revelations about what many consider to be the main official forensic investigation of the United States are content in private text messages, transcripts and correspondence revealed on the moon, in order to solve the problem of failure of The Associated Press ”.
LEA: President Hernandez’s White Series of Proposals in the United States
The publication of the records followed a fall last week in which the district judge of the United States Alison Nathan instructed the Department of Justice to open an internal investigation into a possible malicious conduct of the Fiscal Union of Terrorism and Narcotics International Fiscal Union of the United States for the New York District. .
Tanto el ABC Post as ABC News informs that if Nathan’s jueza did not find evidence that the tax authorities intentionally retaliate against the lawyers representing an Iranian banker, Ali Sadr Hashemi Nejad, dijo who hicieron an “intentional deliberado de ocultar” la verdad e intentionaro “enterrar clave que podría haber ayudado a la defensa.
The mistakes made are serious, including the failure to obtain a condensate, the tax returns all the charges against Sadr.
The documents revealed the lunes burn a detailed vision of the case against Sadr commences to desmoronarse in the lapse of one pocas and turbulent hours in March passed, when the juice establishes a point of completion.
Next, explain a nightmare, the appearance of a bank register that the fiscal line, the federal fiscal adjunct Jane Kim, will present as proof. But it is clear that only the court has agreed with Sadr’s lawyers, a possible violation of the rules intended to guarantee a fair trial.
Kim initially suggested getting on the defense right away. Pero una colleague, the federal fiscal adjunct Stephanie Lake, recommends “hope to hear and enter in some other documents”, dice the note of the media media.
The trick did not work. Sadr’s advocates will identify the document as new in a single hour. If the tax authorities are present, they will declare that the document, a Commerzbank card issued by the Department of the Treasury of the United States, is required to complete the sanctions, the assistance provided in its defense.
ADEMÁS: Informe de la Fiscalía de Nueva York confirms the investigation into Juan Orlando, president of Honduras
The tax authorities, believing that the document has no tenure as an excuse for the defense, inventory an apology and give it to the attorneys who think that the register has been presented in advance, dice.
The last hour of the night of the domingo, the juez Nathan the taxpayer gave the taxpayers a time to explain.
The supervisors of the unit, Emil Bove and Shawn Crowley, se involucraron. In an exchange of text messages, Bove acknowledged that the initial apology that the litigants had to give to Sadr’s lawyers was a “rotating coin”.
Crowley, on account of the gravity of the error of his subordinates and anticipating a dura reprimand, the confia a Bove that in order to mirror the final arguments of the taxpayers, she would “dedicate the rest of the night to clear my office”.
“Puaj. These are poor chicks. This is going to be a song bath”, wrote in a moment of frustration the temperamental antes to compare before the tribunal.
Bove is in agreement and recognizes that the test team has “some very aggressive things here during the last days”. “Sí, mentimos en esa carta”, Crowley replied.
Including the state media citations to an ethics expert who questions the procedure of the tax authorities.
Stephen Gillers, professor of ethics at the Faculty of Law of the University of New York, said that the conduct of taxation in this case, as described, was “alarming”.
“If you can succeed in what many lawyers consider the nation’s chief tax officer, can you succeed?” dijo Gillers. “The behavior here is that one can hope for an aggressively defiant advocate who represents a private party.
+ President Hernández hopes that Tony’s case will go to the second instance in the EU