Meanwhile, six Republican senators voted in favor of a United States presidential candidate Donald Trump during the political juicings that were held in the high chamber of the United States Congress, less than the number of votes cast by the Democratic Party. political rivals to guarantee a possible reprimand.
Following the Republican Party’s’ to ‘The Hill’, Trump’s decision to deny the amnesty to his supporters detained by the Capitol passed 6 years ago led to the disbandment of Republican senators. The Democrats need 17 of their votes to guarantee a majority of the three in the Camera Alta and condone Trump to incite the insurgency to raise public opinion before the election, as well as the accusation in the plight ‘ accusation’.
“If you think you owe it to the people that form part of the bill, the number of senators (Republicans) that the mayor will vote for, because he has a form of saying ‘We are my chicos’, a Republican senator explained anonymously. Other senators, for their part, have declared themselves very concerned about the green arrangements by the president’s secretaries, such as the accusation that Sen. Lindsey Graham’s deputies objected to at the airport two weeks ago.
A third line of action has fueled the futures of the future: a possible condition that Trump could significantly reduce the Republican Party’s reconstruction perspectives given the president’s follow-up to the 2022 legislative elections the official doctrine of the party.
However, the same points are made that the situation is delicate because of a complete overhaul of the Democratic initiative, which means that the former Republicans will have new sons in the hands of a figure that cost the White House and the Congress only four years . Now he is ready to relive the talks about his future “and at some point we will have to discuss the hecho of the Republican Party is much greater than a single person”, however they are.
At the moment, the leader of the Republican minority in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, has proposed to apply the juicy juxtaposition in February with the confidence that the theme will be free. “Dado que ‘impeachment’ es una figura figura para sacar a alguien de un cargo que ostenta, este plao podría incras las las dudas sober la constitutional valid de este juicio. .
También hooi que determinator si el presidente Tribunal Supremo, John Roberts, presidiría el juicio. Well, it’s the job of the correspondent in normal proceedings, never before has the case been heard by a political judge against an ex-president, because of the fact that Roberts’ powder is likely to be recused from the question of harassment.
The next options are Vice President Kamala Harris and the current president, Pat Leahy. Both Democrats, and both partisans of the Trump administration, all disguised as the party as a partisan leader. “Y ahí es cuando comienza a perder legitimidad”, aventuran las fuentes.
Ultimately, this is how the Republican Party will deal with a second option: Trump’s inability to disburse a public cargo. The precedents of his son are most confusing in this aspect. If only there was a need for a simple mayoral vote – that is to say, only a Republican senator would vote in favor, or in extreme cases the Vice President Harris, as President of the Senate – his only vote would be to elect elected officials.