(Bloomberg) – When do Google users navigate in “incognito” mode, how private is their activity?
The Alphabet Unit (GOOG | GOOGL) says that the activation of the cult mode in Chrome, the “private navigation” in other navigators, means that the company does not “record its activity”. But a juxtaposition is known for reproducing the giants of Silicon Valley by its data recovery plant that the data on Google and Google are in high demand for personal information that is being recovered from users.
At an audience held by the Jews in San José, California, the EE.UU District Court. Lucy Koh points out that the investigation into Google’s data recovery practices in a collective request that classifies the company’s private navigation promises as an “engineering” and seeks an indemnity of US $ 5,000 in donations and deductions for those This privacy has been compromised since June 2016.
In evaluating Google’s intention to approve the request, Koh said it considers “unusual” that the company has “additional data” recovery data and does not use the information to create user profiles or direct mail.
Also you can be interested:
Google has turned blank antimonopoly denunciations in the last year presented by state and federal officials – in addition to companies – that it claims to abuse its predominance in digital advertising and online search. Koh has one more story in common with the company by briefly criticizing its privacy policies. Furthermore, it is memorable and obliges Google to make a revelation of the escaneo de correos electrónicos para elaborar perfiles en dirigir publicidad.
In this case, Google has agreed to use parts of its web site code that utilizes its analytics and publicity services to disable historically private browsing from users and to send copies to Google’s servers.
The control of your navigation dates
Google hopes that the private navigation mode will provide users with more control over their data, including Koh Amanda Bonn, representing users. In fact, “Google’s claiming that it basically has very little to do to prevent us from retrieving its data, and that’s why we should assume that we’m getting it,” Bonn said.
Google Scholar Andrew Schapiro argues that the company’s privacy policy “reveals itself” in practice. “Revealing data recovery in question”, dijo.
Another Google advocate, Stephen Broome, said that the owners of web sites contracted with the company to use their analytics services and other services related to the data retrieval described in the application.
Broome’s intention to minimize preoccupations with privacy signaling that the federal court system’s website uses Google terminus services as counterproductive.
The jueza demanded an explanation “about what exactly is Google”, as long as he expressed his concern that visitors to the website of the tribunal reveal information to the company without giving an account. “I want a Google statement about informing users of the court’s web site and how to use it,” Koh said to the company’s lawyers.
VIDEO | 5 extraordinary scientists who came and buried him in the world
Original note: Google reviewer disturbs even ‘incognito’ users
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
Join now to stay ahead of the most trusted business news source.
© 2021 Bloomberg LP