Joe Biden’s immigration juveniles are advocating for the government’s migration reform plan is incomplete because it ‘does not include’ a reform of the Immigration Cases Office (Court of Immigration, EOIR), which operates well. of the Department of Justice (DOJ).
The recently announced integral project “Includes Numerous Proposals to Reform the Immigration System”, doubled the National Association of Immigration Juveniles (NAIJ) in a statement. Prohibition of probes, the initiative “It does not include critical structural reforms in our country’s immigration tribunals,” he added.
On the 20th of January, on the occasion of Biden’s vacancy, the Casa Blanca announced an ambitious plan that included a driveway to the City of the 11 million documented living in the United States, which were first opened by a provisional residence. lasts five years until the end of the days before access to the Green Card (green card).
Three years have passed since receiving the permanent legal residence permit in order to apply for citizenship.
Insist independently
The Association calls for Biden’s plan to include in an emergency “an Independent Immigration Court” and not to operate as “a component of the Department of Justice”.
The NAIJ explains that one of the major problems facing the Immigration Court is the “politicization” of the director’s cargo, which was to deal with a career cargo, during which Trump’s governor was named “political reasons.”
As of today, the EOIR is composed of approximately 500 first instance juices and 23 immigration appeal juices, which are members of the Immigration Appeals Board (BIA).
Jueces advierten that “the decisions of the BIA can create a precedent for the immigration tribunals in all countries”, and that the regulations will be enforced in the last year and that the debt collection process will be promoted by the recent director of the EOIR, which is not obliged to be included inclusive and now has the authority to issue its own precedent decisions ”.
Other preoccupations
The judges also questioned the authority of the Fiscal General, which could “issue precedent-setting decisions” and annulled such decisions as the director of the Immigration Court as the Junction of Appeals “.
“In its current form, immigration tribunals pass a political priority every time a new administration takes office, paralyzing with it its efficiency and affecting the debit process ”, indicated.
The information provided by the Barack Obama (2009-2017) governing body of immigration tribunals “was armed to prioritize the application of the immigration law”. But Trump’s governing body (2017-2021) will prioritize the governing body’s policies, between them and the ‘production of quotes’ that must be managed by others to accelerate processes.
“I have these coats and places the juices that are not filled with the cierre of 700 cases per year or the concomitant dismissed applause, pusieron in risk his works “, subraya el reporte. “The incentive evaluation system — including the requirement — that the juveniles be taken care of, have no appointments and order deportations.” to meet with the requirements of the Executive.
The NAIJ says that the “judicial independence” of the Immigration Court “is serious” and that the governing body of Trump “despises the juvenile immigration laws to administer his expeditions, owns a centralized control through a team of supervised juices recently contracted, many without prior legal experience ”.
Debit process
Immigration juices are the Biden’s governing body that Trump’s “prohibition” closes administrative cases are “obliged” to bar their expeditions to prioritize cases under the “political priority” in lieu of “judicial efficiency”.
“The principles of judicial management do not always coincide with a prosecution perspective, reasoned by any criminal tribunal allowed by the police department, for example, to control its dispatcher”, notes.
Mencionan adds that “the current structure of the EOIR is precisely that, contaminating the neutrality of the decisions of the tribunal” and concludes that the management of the Immigration Court is centered on complying with the deportation policy of the governor and not proper the basic judicial infrastructure necessary to operate a tribunal ”.
In the document the juices explain that the governor should attend and take into account that the Immigration Court has accumulated more than 1.3 million cases and has less than 550 juke. “This is a maximum of 2,600 cases per case, compared to a 440 per case by a District Court.”
The solution, punctualized, passed by the Cens Independence, the assignment of appeals, the number of new juices and the establishment of a “transparent” justice system.
