It’s Trump’s turn to political justice (Analysis)

(CNN) – Donald Trump’s defense attorneys are firing on a firefighter in a firefighting mission to refute a case of political juiciness that the president is a tyrant who pushes his turbo against his fellow countrymen.

But when it comes to reuniting the Jews with three of Trump’s party principals, Senators Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham and Mike Lee – who seem to be serving as impartial judges – it’s clear they will be assisted by Republican senators. so much for controlling political data as for limping Trump’s number.

It was not persuasive that the Democrats’ case during the last week, the gross political mathematics of the Trump administration, was not imported. Today there are no indications that 17 Republican senators have agreed to unite with Democrats to condemn the president for inciting the deadly 6th of January.

As a result of the potential Trump section, it would be difficult to explain to some Republican senators their electorate after three days in which the Democratic justice judiciary constructs a common case against the President using videos that are outrageous. exhaustive.

Travels of a meticulously detailed case that demonstrates the events of this day of many dimensions, builds a straight line of intentions between Trump’s actions and the destruction carried out by workers who organize the life of congressmen, his assistants and deacons . Five other people were killed and more than 140 were injured in what became known as the Cold War.

The Democratic fiscal juvenile justice system claims that Trump passed months that discredit the elections, finally losing a “great deal” that the votes of his party members are robust and their countries are being arrested.

Luego, arguing the Democratic fiscal, Trump called his parties in Washington, in a specific case, considered as the ultimate opportunity to destroy the “robbery” of elections when Congress convenes to certify the victory of Joe Biden. The tax authorities affirm that the president incited the turbo with his false assertions and called them to march in Congress and “lie like the infamous” by him, with full knowledge that his provocation provoked a violent reaction.

LEE: ANALYSIS | Nuevos ontmoedig about the day of terror in the Capitol son of a devastating accusation against Trump

That day, Trump will not just abdicate his constitutional jurisdiction to defend another government of Gobierno, saying that it is “delinquent” with the destruction it is establishing producing in the Capitol, arguing the tax authorities.

If Trump’s defense team were to commit to a real jury, to lie with a group of Republican senators who in their majority mayor had taken the decision to acquit Trump before the trial, he would be facing a high bargaining chip. los hechos y las pruebas en su kontra.

But as a demonstration, the meeting between the defense defenders and Graham, Cruz and Lee, some Republicans will not be interested in maintaining the ownership of their property. Cruz, a Republican from Texas, describes the Trump defense’s six as an opportunity to share his thoughts on legal strategy.

“I believe that the final result of this political trial is very clear to all,” Cruz told CNN. «Donald Trump did next time … The next 67 votes for the condenarlo and the personas and the comedy of the Senado entienden that is no hay of para condenar, ni debería haberlos.

Political considerations

With this allegiance to Trump who is concerned about the judiciary, the political justice chambers will find in his case against the president the juvenile appeals to the conscience and sentencing of each senator to protect and secure assurances that Trump enforces, including a vote that the impediment wants to find a federal cargo.

“Humiliating, humiliating, the allegations that President Trump condemns for the crime of being abusively abusive,” said Representative Joe Neguse, one of the judges of the political judiciary, he concluded. “Because if we do not do it, we pretend that it is not suedi, or peor aún, if we say we do not answer, what can we say that we do not want to succeed?”.

These words can be used to say much about some Republican senators, and this juice is finally in the near future. However, initial comments from Republican senators suggest that it is likely that Trump’s party will maintain control over the primary process in 2022.

Aunque Trump dego el cargo el pasade en el pointo más bajo de sus indices of aprobación (34%) -y hay algunas pruebas pruebases que indican que un significant numre of Republicanos cambiaron su votres votantes Independientes después del 6 de enero– todavía is a force to be reckoned with. The polls suggest that a third of the toadavia electorate is from his barn, including only the deadly events of the Capitol affair, and his approval among the Republicans, even more so than that, toda already has 70% antes de vrag.

Arguments of the fiscals in parecen sameroeper a suficientes republicanos 2:07

Many elected leaders within the Republican Party have not given any reason for arguing over Trump’s era, because they believe that the majority in the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate will be very much in balance by 2022, and there are several divisions that are already in the legislative body. of which the process of redistribution of districts may favor the Republicans in some key states. The history of the country is also that of the Republicans. Historically, the party that sold the White House has left no blank in the midterm elections.

Although Trump’s influence on the Republican Party has a subtext of all the justice, Maryland’s representative Jamie Raskin and his taxpayer’s accomplices are implicitly pushing the senators who are pushing the policy to pay the Jews felt more profoundly about the proposal, repeatedly reiterating the point that the insurrection was an incident that transcended the dividing lines and would mean unresolved issues.

Neglect, a Colorado Democrat, records – to the senators that at one point that the turmoil-stricken “Cuelguen to Mike Pence”, the instinctive Trump was reporting his attacks on his vice president on Twitter. Neglects and other fiscal juices are also trying to influence senators to signal that, despite Trump’s superstition to support the “blue men”, quarrelsome braces in the Casa Blanca while waiting to be followed the police.

“There is a president who complements his (jurisdiction), who does not arrive at his life and security to retain the power. A president who will preserve, protect and defend. Pero eso no fue lo que hizo », dijo Neguse. When the police had to stop and attack with poles », he said in his video to the people who attacked him: ‘Los queremos. Seun muy especiales’. What more issues do we need to know about President Trump’s status? ».

MIRA: What is Trump’s political future serious about and is it absurd in this case?

Questions about Trump’s legal team

In his final argument the players, Raskin planted a series of provocative questions that it is likely that the defensive team can respond to the fours. Why did Trump not say to his party members that the attack on the Capitol would take place as soon as it was announced that he was sued? Why did the envoy send help to the abducted agents of the order during the lesser hours after which the attack began? And why “at no point in this day did the violent insurrection and the insurrections occur?”, Asked Raskin.

Trump’s team has sealed its positive outcome, claiming that its first presentation to Trump was widely criticized, and it’s likely that he will have much to do with what he sees as the 6th of January.

In his arguments for opening this week’s principles, and in recent comments to periodicals, Trump’s defender David Schoen has planted a series of arguments that he does not intend to challenge the evidence against Trump. In fact, he argued that the entire political juicing process was not unconstitutional, and that Trump was a private citizen, meaning that the risk of losing the new turbo would increase. Advirtió que «abriría nuevas y mayores heridas en todo el país».

Schoen’s colleague, Bruce Castor, put forward a valid argument that, in condoning Trump’s inflammatory language, Democrats are pushing for his right to freedom of expression. Schoen has advanced this strategy to confirm that the real goal was to privatize its rights to the 74 million Trump voters to prevent the president from postulating again in 2024. This is an ironic accusation and that is the result of Trump’s repeated allegations of electoral fraud.

Castor received a surrealistic reaction in the case of the Democrats the youths when CNN’s Manu Raju questioned him about his reaction to the fact that a large amount of evidence was presented by the political juvenile justice system that the debtors were recovering from.

“Does Alguien say that President Trump’s directly heard what he was doing?” Castor responded. “Geen creo que eso see lo que pasó, nee”.

The news also shows on CNN that Trump’s team has been looking for evidence on video, including clips from prominent Democrats that use political phrases that include “luchar” slogans.

Senators can see images of Mayor Chuck Schumer’s leader admonishing the Supreme Court that the country ‘cosecharía el torbellino’ should pay attention to the actions of the conservators’ juices. By supuesto, on this occasion, Schumer’s rhetoric does not lead to violence.

According to the informer, the defense also plans to argue that by presenting graphic evidence in the video of the terror within the Capitol, the tax authorities will establish a treatise to glorify the violence or burn entertainment to the television viewers.

Antes de descansar su caso el jueves, los fiscales de la Cámara se esforzaron por contrarrest de posibles argumentos de la defensa. Raskin, for example, said that Senate’s vote on March to declare constitutional justice would mean that the defense alone could build a case against Trump’s innocence.

The Maryland Democrat and fiscal school principal of political justice, who is described as a Trump as a tyrant who “seeks to annul political rights and the sovereignty of the People’s Republic,” argues that senators should not simply swear allegiance to his argument. that the juice in it is unconstitutional because the president is driving his cargo.

“We have solved this legal and constitutional problem. Se acabó », dijo Raskin. Hizo called the Trump defense team to focus on “how to deal with the situation and not regroup the constitutional argument that has been decided by the Senate.”

As such, Republican varios indicate the juveniles have the intention to make their final vote on the constitutionality of the juices, avoiding intervening in the case against Trump.

MIRA: Donald Trump’s Second Political Juice, Between Reason and Emotion

Neglect to discredit the argument that Nadie listened to Trump order the amount that commits violence, a sentence similar to the one adopted by Trump’s defense in his first political trial when his team argued that it did not specifically represent the President of Ukraine. interfere in the election.

The Democrat of Colorado presented multiple examples of Trump alabando to parties that acted violently, or in that Trump appeared to condone the violence, and that the president said exactly what he was doing when the turmoil hit the Capitol.

“His message was as clear as the crystal.” There was no immediate response. Instantly. By his followers », dijo Neguse.

«Geen tenemos que adivinar cómo reaccionaron nie. We can see how the people react to what they say. Ustedes los vieron. Y vieron la violencia ».

Source