La Disciplinary Committee announced that an investigation procedure had been initiated into the atrocities committed in the Atlas vs. America match. It is based on “the provisions of Articles 74, 84 and 85 of the Sanctions Regulations”, the communication states. However, these articles are not subject to “independent action”, as are all created, are subject to “arbitrary error”, and may be the subject of an investigation.
Article 74 dice for next: Competence of the Disciplinary Committee:
a) Rectify, a party petition, THE MANIFESTED ERRORS IN WHICH POWER SHOULD INCLUDE THE ARBITRATION to adopt its disciplinary decisions.
For the purposes of the present order, there is an Arbitral Decision manifestly erroneous when it is demonstrated that the Arbitro, as a consequence of an error, has filed with the expulsion of the game court and an Equatorial Judge, or has adopted an equivocal decision eviction by Tarjeta Roja direct and / or indirect. Assimilation, the Disciplinary Board may at any time subdue the material errors of the calculation.
Errors manifested in which the Arbitro will be charged with perjury of the interests of the Club, may be announced before the Disciplinary Committee, presenting for its effect the corresponding proofs that accrediten the error of compliance with the definition beforehand.
Tratándose de Fase Regular, los Clubes una vez que reciban el Arbitral, podrán present su su denunci a la tardar a las 13:00 horas del día siguiente a akque en que ha finalizte el party. In the event that the venue is closed on Saturday or Sunday, the Club will have until 13:00 on the following Monday hours to present ”.
Only the Club which has issued a manifest error before the Disciplinary Board, in compliance with this decision, may lodge an appeal with the Appeals Board.
(b) Sanction actions taken by incumbent upon the Players who are encroaching on the provisions of Article 23 of the Rules of Procedure (which have sovereignty during the development of the party).
c) Sanction the Violent Conduct of a Judge who does not advertise the Arbitrator and / or the Commissioner and that the Commission has the security of the comet.
d) Tendrá la facultad de conocer des casas graves en que los sujetos a este Reglamento, sobre todo Grupos de Animación, estén involucrados, y que tanto el Árbitro como el Commissario de un parto non hubieran advertido y que la Commisión tenga la certeza de que sucedieron antes, durante y / o despuite del encuentro, y que no corresponden a las disciplinary decisions that the Arbitro adopts in the development of the 90 minutes of the game in the Terreno de Juego.
Lee also: The MX League is relegated to bugs by the bidding in the Atlas vs. America
In Articles 84 and 85, it will be necessary to carry out the application for investigation:
Article 84: Any Club, Judge, member of the Technical Corps, organ of the FMF, including a Professional Division, may apply to the Disciplinary Committee for the initiation of an investigation into previous, ongoing and disputed disputes between the parties and those referred to in Article 74 of the Cyd, the present Regulations and which have not been observed by the Arbitral Court or the Commissioner of the Party.
Asimismo, a Club may apply for the initiation of an investigation into the cases under which Article 23 of the Rules of Procedure is referred to.
Solicitudes de Investigación solo podrán ser interpuestas por los Clubs que participat en del parti donde ocurrieron los hechos que se van a klamar.
Article 85: The request for investigation must be presented before the Disciplinary Board has 48 hours after the end of the last part of the Jornada from which it takes place, in the case of extraordinary parties at the Jornada fair, the place will be 24 hours after the end of the part .