India court reverses Amazon’s future retail sale to Reliance

An Indian court on Monday reversed an order that would prevent Reliance Industries – a major Amazon (AMZN) competitor – from the purchase of Future Retail.

The Delhi High Court only last week ruled that the sale of Future Retail should be stopped at $ 3.3 billion. While the court noted that its ruling was not yet final, it said that “immediate orders” are needed to protect Amazon’s rights, and ordered that all parties involved in the agreement “uphold [the] status quo “while being consulted.

This week, however, another bank at the same court ruled that it was not necessary to stop the deal after Future Group appealed. The judge has yet to issue the final order, but Future Retail and Reliance Industries currently have the upper hand.

Shares of Future Retail rose 10% on Tuesday.

Amazon sues $ 3.3 billion retail deal involving India's richest man
The ruling is the latest development in the form of a proxy battle between two of the richest men in the world for the fast growing market for India. What’s at stake is strategic access to a network of popular grocery stores and other retailers in India, something that Jeff Bezos’ Amazon and Reliance, owned by India’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani, either wants for themselves or to prevent the other one from gaining.

At the heart of the fight is Future Retail, the cash cow of the Indian conglomerate Future Group. The retail unit contains brands such as Big Bazaar, a popular supermarket chain.

Amazon and Walmart both dominate the e-commerce sector in India. But Ambani has ambitions to challenge it with JioMart, its online grocery platform that is expected to expand into everything from electronics and clothing to pharmaceuticals and healthcare.

In August 2019, Amazon invested in a Future Group entity that gave a 4.8% stake in Future Retail on September 30 last year, according to the submission of securities. The deal gave Amazon the right of first refusal to acquire more shares in Future Retail, according to one of the documents.

Amazon has argued that the agreement between 2019 and the Future Group entity includes a non-compete clause, a person familiar with Amazon’s thinking told CNN Business last year. The clause contained 30 restricted parties with which Future Retail and Future Group could not do business, and Reliance was on the list, the person said.

People leaving a Big Bazaar store in Mumbai in November.  Future Retail owns the popular supermarket chain.
Amazon has tried to enforce the agreement through the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC), with the country in Southeast Asia often seen as a neutral jurisdiction to settle disputes. The SIAC emergency arbitrator ordered a temporary cessation of the agreement last October.
While Future Group asked questions about the validity of the arbitration order of Singapore in India, the Supreme Court in Delhi last week declared the order ‘enforceable’ and suspended the agreement.

While the latest move on Monday allows the agreement to continue, the battle is far from over. The Delhi Supreme Court has yet to deliver its final ruling, which could jeopardize Reliance and Future’s plans again, according to Bharat Chugh, a Supreme Court lawyer specializing in arbitration law.

Eventually, the country’s high court can hear the case, if both sides appeal. Future Retail, Reliance and Amazon did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

– CNN’s Rishi Iyengar contributed to this report.

.Source