IDP warns HR 1 could be ‘absolutely devastating for Republicans’

HR 1, known as the For the People Act, seeks to remove obstacles to the vote, reform the role of money in politics, and tighten federal ethical rules. One of the key principles of the bill to revamp the country’s electoral system: to offer no apology for the post, at least 15 days of early voting, automatic registration of voters and the restoration of voting rights to criminals serving their prison sentences completed.

Democrats’ comprehensive bill passed the House – for the second time – along party lines earlier this month and was introduced in the Senate this week. But the GOP is facing strong opposition from the GOP over its potential implications for future elections, including the 2022 means, with some Republicans openly fearing that wider access to voting would harm the party’s chances.

For Republicans, HR 1 represents a Democratic ‘grip on power’ that could tip elections in their favor for years to come, according to Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. post it. One lawmaker in the state of Arizona called it “anti-Republican.”

“HR 1 is an attempt to exploit the slim majority of Democrats to unlock the playing field and deprive the rights of about half of the electorate in the country,” said Mark Weaver, a GOP consultant in Ohio and an advocate in suffrage.

Other Republicans condemn the bill as a naked federal violation of state rights, saying the legislation would resort to the decentralized electoral system in favor of a nationalized approach.

And some Republican lawmakers, officials and strategists go even further, pointing out that the GOP’s opposition to such extensive electoral reforms is based on the fear that it will lead to the loss of the election.

“If the Democrats pass HR 1, it’s going to be absolutely devastating for the Republicans in this country,” said Jay Williams, a Republican strategist in Georgia, one of the most aggressive campaigners to curtail the vote. “They’re basically going to have just as many Republicans in places where they would actually get opportunities to pick up.”

In Arizona, another battlefield with an onslaught of election-directed legislative battles, the state Rep. John Kavanagh, a Republican, told CNN: “Democrats value people as much as possible to vote, and they are willing to risk fraud. Republicans are more concerned about fraud, so we do not care about security measures. set that does not allow everyone to vote – but not everyone may vote. ‘

The measure comes because many Republican lawmakers, some of whom have pleaded Trump’s unfounded allegations of widespread fraud, now tend toward what they cast as a lack of confidence in the democratic process to justify their election-related offense. Republican lawmakers in 43 states have so far advanced at least 250 bills aimed at, among other things, limiting absenteeism and early voting and enacting stricter electoral laws, among others, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.

The debate over HR 1 reflects the broader settlement in the IDP on how to win elections in the post-Trump era, when the main motivator for both parties is no longer on the ballot. Since history and conventional wisdom point to an advantage in the middle of the party out of power, some Republicans are convinced that HR 1 can make a difference.

‘I think stop [H.R. 1] is more relative to future Republican success than Donald Trump, “Williams said, as the former president remains the most influential Republican in the party. The consequences of passing legislation would be very difficult for Republicans to gain a majority status after that. “

But Republican fears do not necessarily permeate states where, even with more people voting, they found success in 2020, such as North Carolina, Ohio and Kentucky.

“I think it’s a mistake for Republicans to believe that they can not win elections under any particular voting model. I think it’s wrong and absurd, but it’s the same mistake the Democrats made trying to push HR 1. , “said Michael Adams. The Republican Secretary of State of Kentucky, before adding that in the recent election a high turnout led to more registered Republicans participating for the first time in the history of the state as Democrats.

Democrats, in turn, point to Republican wholesale to curb voting rights as the driving force to urgently continue on HR 1, which could serve as a setback to stifle state-level voting.

President Joe Biden made it clear in a statement that the reforms of the bill were “urgently needed”, adding that he “looks forward to signing it into law once it has passed the legislative process.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., underlined the series of attacks by Republicans on the electoral system in defense of the Senate bill.

If one political party believes that ‘we win heads, we cheated’, if one political party believes that when you lose an election, the answer is not to win more votes, but rather to try to stop that the other party votes, then we have serious and existential threats to our democracy at hand, “Schumer said on Wednesday.” That is why we need S.1 so much. “

The proposal faces a difficult path forward to overcome the 60-vote threshold in the equally divided Senate unless the Democrats reform the filibuster.

Biden said in an interview with ABC News on Wednesday that he is not opposed to looking back at the ‘talking filibuster’, which requires opposing senators to speak incessantly on the Senate floor until the bill is dropped or proponents of the vote has. .

Schumer made it clear at a news conference on Wednesday that the Democrats would make the decision on the bill as “failure is not an option”.

.Source