(CNN Español) – In a lawsuit filed by the World Attention in a case of police brutality and violence against the Negro community in the United States, the judge Peter Cahill is now in the center of attention, who will establish the sentence of Derek Chauvin’s sentence George Floyd.
Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer, was found guilty of George Floyd’s homicide. The vertebrate provoked celebratory celebrations in all United States three years of protests against police brutality.
Now that Chauvin has declared himself a criminal, the judge Peter Cahill will determine his sentence using the statutory fees and considering the motion of a taxpayer for an increase in the sentence committed to certain factors.
This is what we know about Peter Cahill.
Juez Peter Cahill.
Who is Peter Cahill?
Peter Cahill is the judge in the court of Derek Chauvin. Fue nombrado membro del Cuarto Circuito Judicial in 2007 and has won the reelection in three occasions. Su mandato actual expiration in 2027, is perfect on the website of the Rama Judicial de Minnesota.
Cahill has more than 30 years of experience teaching law in Minnesota and has taught at the Faculty of Law of the University of Minnesota, the Faculty of Law Mitchell Hamline and the Faculty of Law at the University of St. Louis. Thomas, según su perfil.
Cahill will decide Chauvin’s sentence in June.
The case against Derek Chauvin
Cahill had used notorious “eulogies” in his work in the lawsuit against Chauvin, reports The New York Times. Quienes lo conocen lo han descrito como un juez «audaz y decisivo», «cordial y respetuoso», según reportó NPR.
In the mediating case of George Floyd’s death, the Minnesota Judge charged the members of the jury with the imperative to separate his points of view on race and chauvin from the evidence and the evidence that the tax authorities enter the courtroom. He was shocked when the Minneapolis city council announced a US $ 27 million civil agreement with the Floyd family before the trial. According to The New York Times, this agreement “generates words that the jury will influence”, and also generates terms that can influence in “the fall of a court of appeals against the charges against Chauvin”.
On Tuesday, Cahill’s wife made a statement that officials did not comment on “irresponsible” remarks about the judiciary and its function as justice administrators, except for the medial nature of the matter.
“I would like electors to be able to talk about this case, especially in a way that is irresponsible in the state of law and the power of justice and our function,” said Cahill. “Creo que si quieren dar su opinion, deben hacerlo de forma retetuosa y coherente con su juramento a la Constitución, de respetar una rama de goiberno coigual”.
El juez ya se había pronunciado de una manera sproglige ein June 2020, when the preliminary hearings of the case will take place. Cahill hizo un llamado to the attorneys or officials related to the juicio for not commenting publicly on the merits of the case, probable proof of guilt or ignorance, even if no formal silence order is issued.
The case law is as important to the tax authorities as it is to the defense to ensure that any person regarding the influence of this decision is made public.
Cahill also made a publicity stunt, indicating that any inappropriate public statement about the case could result in a change of place to another place in the Sea of Minneapolis, before the juices were delivered to the city.
También, in “a precedent”, according to NPR, Cahill allowed the courts to enter the court to transmit the totality of the juicie and that due to the covid-19 pandemic the space in the court was greatly reduced.
“The only form of re-indicating the constitutional right of the accused to a public hearing and the constitutional rights of the media and the public of access to the criminal cases is to allow the audio and video coverage of the hearing”, said the judge reported NPR.
And his decisions in other cases also gave him a high degree of credibility as juez. As of 2015, when Cahill unveiled the charges against the organizers of a Black Lives Matter march, it was announced that the protest would be a pacifist. In 2019, the dio casi the maximum sentence to a prominent patina trainer on sexual abuse, reports – The New York Times.
What happened in the trial against Chauvin?
The jew Peter Cahill said this March that Pasaran would also appear in the antecedents of Derek Chauvin. And even though the police force has released a bail hearing from October, Cahill has revoked the verdict, which will now delay the sentence in the prison.
Cahill said that the tribunal would examine Derek Chauvin’s written arguments “within a week” and issue follow-up facts with respect. Luego orderarán un informa de investigatie previo a la sentencia, que debe terminar «en cuatro semanas». This will be followed by an informative session on the information of the preliminary investigation into the sentence within six weeks and “the second sentence will also be sent”.
Now there are months of decisions for Peter Cahill in a case where the Floyd family hopes to be prosecuted, then the decision of the juez powder “will be a big step forward to meet justice in the United States”, as President Joe Biden said this March.
– With information from Amir Vera, Caroline Kelly and Eric Levenson from CNN.