As well as being promoted during his campaign, one of the first mediocre ordinances by Joe Biden during his first day as President of the United States was to detain the construction of the wall on the front with Mexico.
During the jornada the new mandate also announced other important changes in migration policy material, empezande by a project of lei that establishes a truck haasi the city for more than 11 million undocumented.
But there is no better example of the rupture with the policies of the previous administration as the end of the construction of the wall, this time the most representative project of all the term of Donald Trump.
“It was built 300 miles (480 kilometers) from the front wall,” Trump said on August 28, in a statement just after the Republican National Convention ended its candidacy for re-election.
These balances’ both lads of the wall allow interaction between people’s both lads of the front.
“The wall will soon have a list and our numbers on the front are the best in history. For sure, Mexico is paying for the wall, if not for me“, añadió en esa oportunidad el mandatario.
Despite the fact, todos sus actos de campña, Trump insists on ideas and ideas: that the wall advances rapidly and that the invoice is from the Mexican lad.
According to the mandate projections, it is hoped that by 2021 the hubs will be completed a total of 800km.
One of the first mediators of Biden was to detain the construction of the wall.
Like many other things, the actual result will be quite different.
How much will the Trump wall actually advance if Biden closes the federal finance law that will keep the project alive?
Como is the front
We look forward to some context.
The frontier between the United States and Mexico has a length of 3,142 kilometers and as far as Trump is concerned about the White House, he has barricades the separation walls in a third of the front, one 1,050km.
In more urban areas, barriers are in place to impede the path of vehicles and vehicles.
The walls are of different types: in some segments are panels of corrugated or corrugated acre, in other parts there is a mall of height or superfluous varieties, and in sector sectors, there are vertical bars that are between 5.5 and 9.1 meters of high ceilings on cement and separated by small pebbles.
Installation of a vertical post office secondary in California.
In the most remote areas, the goberno usa “cercas vehiculares”, that his posts of madra cruzados (generally obtenidos de las ferroviarias) que impiden el paso de vehicules pero que pueden ser superados por peatones.
On the front border between San Diego and Tijuana, the valleys are located up to 100 meters in the sea and are lined with materials resistant to oxidation and saline corrosion.
The wall or valley separates San Diego and Tijuana and is located one of the 100 subways in the lake.
In the rest of the front, where there are mountainous, deserted, humid and canal zones to the north of the Bravo River (or the Great River), there is no high-rise structure for humans: nature forms its own barrier.
At some points, the front has two or more barriers, one behind the other. Authorities refer to them as primary, secondary and secondary barriers.
Trump’s Promise and Figures
During 2016, Trump promised to build the wall long enough for the front.
It was later announced that only the meeting would take place, so that nature would be in charge of the rest.
The Bravo River (Grande EE.UU River) and other geographical accidents create a natural frontier for cross-country skiing.
Difficulties in finding funding for the wall will cover the president’s plans.
For a few weeks of elections and with more than three years and a governing body on the cusp, Trump is jealous that the wall is practically listed.
Part of the wall will pass the desert as it is separate from San Luis, Colorado, from Sonora.
At the moment, the president claims that he has built 480km and hopes that by the principles of 2021, a total of 800km will be completed.
Pero the official figures show a different currency.
The dates
Following the last dates of the Office of the Aduanas and the Frontier Protection of the United States (CBP, by its English records), 4 years ago it was built “452 miles” (727 kilometers) from the llamado “new frontal wall system”.
But even though it does not appear to be very promising by Trump, a more detailed analysis of the figures offers a very different retreat.
Distinctive frontier points of Texas are the site of the construction works or the restoration of the wall.
Effectively, more than 700 km of construction will be carried out in this area – most people will make changes to existing structures or repairs that will be delayed.
This means that in reality only 129 kilometers of new wall will be built, of the 53km tracks corresponding to secondary valleys, which give a total of 76 km of primary barriers completely new.
The difficulties to build cero
The hecho of which Governor Trump does not powder forward in the construction of a completely new wall is explained by various reasons.
One of them is the mentioned difficulty to build in zones where nature is impressive, especially in the mediations of the Great River.
The valley also crosses rural and agricultural areas, as is the case in Brownsville, Texas. The rancheros of the north that have properties on the cross at the front by a large metal gate with security guard.
También hay that tener in account that many of the free zone barriers are located in private property terraces and his two have not been able to allow a wall to be erected on his land.
The difference between the states of the west, where much of the land is under the control of the governor, there are tens of thousands of rivers in the river, ridges and other properties in private homes of Texas.
Some property registration records, others are available for multiple heirs.
The governing body plans to use its expropriation right to acquire the land, but the process is slow and involves legal action.
And these obstacles are the sum of the failure window total necessary to complete the construction done.
Trump’s vision on the wall changes from time to time in the White House.
What we live by the following point: Who paid for the wall?
Mexico en la mira
On January 25, 2017, Trump issued a decree authorizing the construction of the wall on the front.
Some months ago, in April, Trump tuvo que renunciar a hacer la obra en su primer año fiscal as president, as was his promise.
The mandate insists on the large-scale infrastructure operation financed by Mexico.
President Trump is insisting that the final finale is in the form of Mexico-based pagando la construcción del muro fronterizo.
The Mexican president, Enrique Peña Nieto, has denied the allegations in a statement issued Friday stating “Similar, baseless allegations concerning Mexico’s intelligence have been made more than once.
And in a meeting at the White House, like Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, like Trump avoid the delicacy asunto.
The presidents of Mexico and the United States will not discuss the financing of the wall during their meeting at the Casa Blanca in early July.
As a matter of fact, the State Mandate always insists that Mexico be punished by the wall, even though the official dates are also contradictory.
According to CBP, the financing for the construction process of the Departments of National Security, Defense and Treasury.
We would like to thank you for the declaration of state of emergency in the front line of the door by Trump on February 15, 2019.
The President justifies that the declaration was necessary for protect the country from a “drug and criminal invasion” Mexico’s lawsuit alleging “serious risk to national security”.
Allow the permission to deviate to the wall US $ 6,300 million of the defense parties of the Department of Defense for the fight against drugs.
This amount amounts to US $ 3,600 million of the Department of Defense’s defense for US $ 3,400 million annual CBP (which depends on the Department of National Security).
Wall of metal panels visible from Mexico.
All other US $ 1,375 million parties will be approved by Congress in 2018 total US $ 15,000 million, a lower amount to the US $ 25,000 million initially presupposed for the construction of the wall.
In any case, none of these parties appeared in Mexico.
And Biden’s Campaign Team did not hesitate to rate the wall as “a money loss “ que “desvía recursos critiques de las amenazas reales”.
The team says that, in its location, federal funds will be dismantled as new frontier control vehicles.
Here are the things, all indications are that the wall is not going to be crescent and that the debate over its finances and its end.