George Floyd Judgment: The fiscal lance was his last allegation to condone Chauvin’s police on Floyd’s death: “Create what you want. Fue un assesinato ”| International

The trial of Derek Chauvin’s lawyer on the death of African-American George Floyd has ended this Monday and a verdict in a high-climate climate in Minneapolis, with public schools closed for pre-trial detention and the military of the National Guard. In his final argument, fiscal Steve Schleicher asked the jury to create “what he sees in his eyes” and “what he puts in his threes”. “It was not a police operation, it was assigned,” he recalled. The 25th Mayo death sentence, videotaped, the mayor’s protest protest against racism in 50 years and United States will take place in this court of 6 as a place where there will be a worldwide message.

‘No puedo respirar’. George Floyd’s Last Words Before Morning, Converted To A National Grid Against Racism, Appearances These Days For Everybody Lives In Pisa In Minneapolis, Writes In Coaches, Plasmaids In T-Shirts . This rich city of the State of Minnesota, a guide from EE UU Pegado to Canada, has shared its history with Floyd’s death and is now about to break the final morale. Famous activists of the civil courts, such as the defendants Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, have been charged in court with levies of negligence to support the family in the last day of trial.

More information

“Use the common sense, create what he sees in his eyes, ustedes han visto lo que han visto”, said this month to the lawyer Schleicher, special assistant of the Minnesota fiscal court. This process, he recalled, “is not against the police, it is a process in favor of the police”. Chauvin, 45 years old, “traced his place, abandoned his values ​​and his training and gave it to a man”, he added. Schleicher has been looking for hours in an exhibition in which he has tried to humanize Floyd, discussing his problems in order to recall that, although in principle he does not cooperate with the agents he wanted to detain, “he was not an amenity” and was not justified by the use of force.

The juicing commences three weeks with the vision of Floyd’s detention and death, a video of nine minutes and 29 seconds in which there is a black man of 46 years buried in the column, with the wheel of a police in the cuello, mientras clama que no respede puede, suplica que le dejen, acaba delirando e invokando a su madre difunta para acabar immovil, inconsciente, muerto, sin que la rodilla del uniformado se muve de allí. Other agents (who need juice) help them return. The episode corresponds to May 25 of last year. This day, a patrol eavesdropped on a thief, Cup Foods, who denounced that some had paid with a $ 20 counterfeit ticket and arrested Floyd in a brutal manner while transporting the grabber and pedophile to Chauvin. Luego quedó en silencio y poco despuis su corazón paro debido a la asfixia, segun el forense y los medes expertos aportados por la fiscalía.

During three weeks of appearances, defender Eric Nelson, intended to counter the flow of imaginary neighbors and tried to create a reasonable doubt in the jury, highlighting Floyd’s drug use for arguing that he did not commit a crime of a maneuver of immobilisation that, sustainably, was necessary for resistance and opposition. This is the last time he was convicted in the juvenile court of Minneapolis, Medaria Arradondo. In a habitual little testimony, against a member of the corps, Arradondo accuses the agent of violating the rules of the department, then, even the maneuver of immobilization with the rodilla in the spring is authorized, [Chauvin] debió parar ”. The agent also complied with the need to dispose of medical aid when he was most unconscious.

“These nine minutes and 29 seconds [del vídeo que ha dado la vuelta al mundo] ignoring the 16 minutes and 59 second previews ”, recalls this Monday the defender defended. Nelson hizo hincapié in that Floyd resists the arrest principle: “Three police agents did not fire meter capable in the patrol car”.

Chauvin, who declined to testify, was charged with the charges of improper homicide, assigned in second degree (implicit intention in the first, but not premeditated) in third degree assessment (defined in Minnesota as the comitic by alguien that only objective to eat, causes death by acting in a pink form, with a “deprived mind” and being taken care of by the human life).

The jury, formed by a dozen men and women of the county, will enter and leave now at a hotel to decide a verdict on unanimity on any of their loads.

This is the sentence of a man on the death of another man and so it is up to him to decide the jury, but about his men he has always appeared in an episode of history. The judge, Peter Cahill, noted that “his sole responsibility” is “to decide on factual issues”. The deliberations can take place in hours, days or weeks. “Tengan has the hope of being late and longing for the idea of ​​being late,” he warned last week. Fuera, in las calles, in las concentrations y vigilias que comenzaron aquel 25 de mayo y se repiten estos días, la sentencia parece onherroeplik. Also the news that the development of that episode had a very humble result distinguished Floyd from being a white man.

Subscribe here a la newsletter from EL PAÍS America and receive all the information keys of the region’s news.

Source