Fernando Guerrero’s decision to turn America’s penalties into controversy over social issues
Al minuto 40, el árbitro Fernando Guerrero corrected VAR, to revise Roberto Alvarado’s bar on Alvaro Fidalgo was penalized. The central decision that is, by which the Eagles take the delusional grace to this decision and immediately commences the controversy.
The arbitration analyst of ESPN, Felipe Ramos Rizos, considers the decision of Fernando Guerrero atinada, debido a que primero había marcado que no había falta y después reculó gracias al VAR.
“Penal sanction in America’s favor. If it fails ”, assures the silencer in his social speeches, while Fernando Guerrero revisits the action in the Aztec stadium.
One time Emanuel Aguilera scored the 1-0, thanks to the penalty, the commentator of ESPN, David Faitelson calculates the decision of “regalito” for the Eagles.
“Regalito” by America … We hope that the party… increases, “published the periodical of ESPN. “A memorable little party and a penal full of controversy … The Blue-American Cross, just now, a deception…”, summed up in another of his comments.
According to the publications of David Faitelson and Felipe Ramos Rizo, in social speeches the penal phrase “penalized” tends to be debated, and some viewers consider that it is wrong about Álvaro Fidalgo, while others have discussed it del área.
With this action, Aguilera approves to score the 1-0, the only one of the party has the middle time. America will end the race of 12 consecutive victories of the Cruz Azul, while those of Santiago Solari will take part in the Octave consecutive triumph, in the first round of the Argentine in front of the azulcreams.
Cruz Azul sums up six visitors’ goals without receiving a goal, marking the end against the Eagles at the Aztec Stadium, debiting a penalty that marks the VAR.