The United States endorsed the tone of its criticism of the Haitian government and demonstrated its “condolence” on the “authoritarian” and “anti-democratic” actions adopted by President Jovenel Moise.
The United States Embassy in Puerto Príncipe reverts to this year a series of cases from the Deputy Secretary of the Asuntos Office for the Occupational Hemisphere of the Department of EE.UU, Julie Chung, in that first Washington was condensed in Moise, in the midst of the grave institutional crisis with juices and opposition.
“I have been alarmed by the recent authoritarian and anti-democratic actions, since this unilateral and judicial review of the Court of Cassation and periodic attacks,” said Chung.
The official of the Department of State said that United States “does not call itself a candidate when it attacks the democratic institutions and civil society”.
“We condone all the intentions of supporting democracy through violence, the suppression of civil liberties or intimidation,” he said.
Assimilation, urging all parties to the Haitian crisis to compromise organizer lo antes posible las legislative elections postponed from 2019.
In this way, Chung was challenged in the controversy over three juices by the Corte de Casación, accusing the latter week of the Haitian president’s planning of a golf course.
The Haitian Constitution impedes the decision of the judges of the High Tribunals, and as such Moses has disputed that the opposition announced that it would not recognize the authority of the mandate and number it as “interim president” to Joseph Mécène Jean Louis, one of them three cesados.
Debate on the application of the legislative elections of 2019, Parliament has not been renewed, with which it is practically safe from the year 2020, a circumstance that has allowed Moise to govern by decree of entones.
Moise pretends to hold a referendum next April to approve a new Constitution and after, in September, organizer of the legislative applications from 2019 and the presidents, in which no candidate can be nominated.
Without embargo, the opposition opposes these plans and demands that the mandate abandon the power of intermediate form, in order to pass a “transition”.