Víctor Díaz Rúa, implicated in the Odebrecht case, is responsible for the moon of this month that the testimony of Mauricio Dantas Bezerra, legal director of the construction company referendum in the country, was created by the Public Ministry.
“A person who vengeance and says he has chosen, or he has given, because he has done what he says; lo que él dijo fue un disparate que, obviamente, I’m sure that it has been prepared by the Public Ministry, they are following the diarrhea: you have to say that this is because you are not going to care, they have no interest in this case ”, said Díaz Rúa before entering the auditorium on Thursday following the trial of the Odebrecht case.
The taxpayer agrees that the employees of the constructor rob the diner and decides that he is willing to give up to quarrel with the property.
De acuerdo a Díaz Rúa, Dantas Bezerra can not be considered a testament onuitsienlike puesto que llegó al país hace 8 años y que nunca había hablado con él o visto.
“Lo he él dijo no vale nada. First, wine 8 years later; secondly, yo lo vi por primera vez ahí (haciendo referencia a la sala de audiencias), yo nunca en mi vida lo había visto ”, dijo.
Of its kind, the defense counsel for Plantearon previously stated that the testator had not mentioned what he had seen, it was versions of those that he had entered indirectly by other written sources, without direct knowledge of the witnesses cited. sobre supuestos sobornos.
This Monday continues the juice of the Odebrecht case, in which six accusados enfrentan cargos de recibir sobornos van US $ 92 millones de parte de la empresa brasileña for the adjudicaran contracts of works of the Dominican State.
The audience that lived to see the jewels Jissel Naranjo, Tania Yunes and Gisselle Méndez, continues this Monday with the comparison of Mauricio Dantas Bezerra, legal director of Odebrecht in the country, which in his testimony the past explains the form in which he realize its paychecks with the end to obtain contracts for works of the State.