The Panel on the Special Independent Tax (PFEI) determines to recommend to its special tax authorities the actions of those responsible in the COVID-19 trial purchase, by which it accepts the recommendation of the Department of Justice not to investigate the matter.
For its determination, the Panel evaluates the legal declarations submitted in the fiscal summary by Justice. Of those surgeries that various functionaries and persons, without legal authority, intervene independently with lawsuits and acquisitions clearly regulated. It includes the required precautionary statement regarding the Entries Interina de Salud for the company to sign in 20 minutes a multi-million dollar order without following the analysis and rigor that the normative requirements.
In addition to the initial referendum involving Governor Wanda Vázquez Garced and other officials, the PFEI — following the record given to its consideration—, centered the inquiry into Lilliam Sanchez, Governor of the Government; Mabel Cabeza, staff of La Fortaleza, co-ordinator of the Task Force Medico of COVID, General José Burgos, Commissioner of the Maneuver of Emergencies; and the licensed Juan Maldonado, as a possible employee.
Nonetheless, the Panel has specified that it does not exercise liability for various employees referred to in the Resolution issued. As established by its facilitator, it has no impediment to the FEI’s determination to amplify its investigation into these, by obtaining the median amount of evidence that could present a case to the tribunals against the remaining persons referring to Justice.
El Panel contains a fondo al Lcdo. Ramón Mendoza Rosario, Independent Special Tax Fiscal, which will be assisted by other fiscal delegates following the workload of the applicants and referrals.
Contra Lilliam Sanchez, Mabel Cabeza and the general Burgos, the commission of inquiry, is predicted in the possible violations of the Criminal Code in its Art. 261 (Influencia indebida); Art. 254 (Intervention involving governmental operations); Art. 262 (Incumplimiento del deber); Art. 263 (Loss of public funds through action and omission and negligence); Art. 264 (Publication of Public Funds); Art. 269 (Perjurio). Also attributes infringements to Art. 3.2 of the Code of Anti-Corruption (Obligations and Ethical Responsibilities).
As regards the officials, it also tends to consider the infringement allegations in Article 4.2 of the Government Ethics Act. , influenza indebida y perjurio, respectively.
Equally, possible violations of the Anti-Corruption Code. “Certainly we have a case and a high level of public interest where we have to ensure that no one conducts anything, but that human pain lasts during a pandemic, so that the front can be turned into a desensitized and insensitive process.” to raise agendas and unsolicited sales, ”the Panel said in its Resolution. At the time of writing, the constitutional mandate of velar is being clarified as the use of the diners of the people has been linked to the general welfare of all citizens. This is what public policy is opposed to corruption and the lies that combat it.
“The previous mandates indicated not yet suspended a state of emergency. If the mayor is strict and disciplined, ”the Resolution said, exposing the balance between the responsibility to attend to emergencies, and the constitutional and legal obligation to ensure the control and correctness of public funds.
Accordingly, it is the duty of the FEI to evaluate and determine whether any of the other employees mentioned in the information should respond to the agreement in this case, in accordance with the test obtained in the course of its investigation.