The issue of the three causes for the voluntary disruption of the embargo will be reimbursed with the entry of the Chamber of Deputies, according to which the Justice Committee of this body opted to pass the new Criminal Code is a legislative initiative.
This decision shall divide the water within the National Congress, with deputies in favor and against this initiative, but now a third party, the political parties, will agree.
More so from the appearances of the political parties, the deputies have made it clear that they do not accept the “lines” that can “get” their organizations with respect to the theme, even if each deputy decides in a particular way.
Some goods included include this “line of lines” as a “time loss” by virtue of its political organizations, maintaining its voting position, ‘n guns o in contra, as a personal decision.
“Political organizations that are very careful. My organization has a position with relation to this topic and it declares that the legislators, and it is the one that we have in each of these, has its particular position and probably the position of the parties not incumbent on the decision in the home. the day that the project is known ”, expressed Amado Díaz, deputy of the Modern Revolutionary Party (PRM).
In particular, the governing party, led by President Luis Abinader, has maintained a position of support with regard to the approval of abortion both the three causes, but not all the legislators of the Chamber of Commerce are in favor of it.
A counter example to the position maintained by the mandate, expressed by the PRM’s deputy, Napoleon López, who is self-qualified as “provided”, as long as he increases the possible incidence of his party.
“We want ours to make us decide, because we want to have the manganese,” said López.
Quien también se calificó como una “abanderada de la vida” fue Nelsa Shoraya Suárez, deputada del PRM y membro de la commission kommiaal ‘n vrag de estudiar el proyecto de sobre interrupción voluntaria del embarazo, pero se musr más factible a una posible inference of the parties.