The defense counsel’s defense expresses that these rights of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States the protégé resp.
Well, Raskin, as an example of the false guitar analogy he used in a theatrical theater, as much as he cites in legal contexts to demonstrate that everything is protected by the First Amendment, it’s clear that Trump’s right can be broken more than a bomber jefe who “Send a multitude not to grit fugue in a theater full of people, sin to take fugue the theater in llamas”.
Raskin indicates that his bomber was trying to seduce him, but Trump said he had violated his right to freedom of expression. With a soundtrack, the representative would immediately indicate that “Actually, it is not necessary to have the faculty of law to understand what is wrong with this argument.”
The representative clarified that if the intentions were to do so, the President would express a simple opinion at a meeting with which there was no agreement and that he should be prosecuted. ‘Eso have nothing to do with the reality of these loads ni con su delito konstitusioneel ”.
Raskin recorded that Trump used and hizo valer su influencia para provoca el fervoroso ataque al Capitolio, reason enough to not consider as a simple city stadium promotion.
Raskin indicates that Trump did not just go to great lengths to pursue the attack, saying that he too “would extend the fugue on television with allegory and deletion.”
Because if well, a citizen has the freedom -protected by the First Enforcement- to co-ordinate by the one who expresses his support for all countries in the directive in favor of the deregulation of the federal governor, if the president has exactly the same, Raskin asks: “Are you alright here that dude because there is a violation of his cargo law to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution?”.
To support his argument, Raskin said that more than 150 constitutional academics had rejected the former Prime Minister’s argument, calling it “legally voluntary” in a public card, because it had no application in a political case.
The representative indicates that if Trump breaks the law that he will occupy the presidential cargo We can accuse, condense, destroy and permanently decalcify to occupy any cargo of honor, trust or luxury in the United States “.
‘Senators, you can not be our future. It is not possible to be the future of America ”, conclusion Raskin su intervención.