David Faitelson and Fernando Palomo ‘discuss’ in relation to the “game of potatoes” in America vs. Olympia

Faitelson defended that America did not enter the “game of the frogs”, while saying that Palomo signaled that his “absurd” words could not be passed on to the violence

ESPN’s analysts Fernando Palomo and David Faitelson discuss rhetoric about how Olympia will host the duel in the final of the Concacaf Ante America Champions League Final., which originated in the fracture of the midcentre Jesús López, as well as other waves for Sebastián Córdova and Nicolás Benedetti.

By a lad, Faitelson mentions that “America is arrogant” and avoids caring about the same game that the Honduran club, while Palomo describes his words and signals that his “absurd”, because he should not promote violence about the cancha.

“America ‘is arrogant’. It does not enter the game of ‘las patadas’ that the Honduran club proposes and confides in an arbitration that does not exist. America shows that it is ‘territorial’ and the pistes, a formula and its adversaries “How do you do that?” Faitelson wrote on Twitter.

“Tampoco can be involved in the promotion of brusque play. This is absurd”, Palomo contested in the same message.

With a new text, Faitelson defines his posture as new and indicates that he should not have earned merits in the Olympics, which at the post won 0 to 1 as a visit to the Aztec Stadium, because the azulcrema club was separated in a complicated moment and the lack of character to enter the duel.

Palomo replied that if he did not get the credit, he could very well suggest that the golf course is adequate to win over a rival.

“And it’s time to admit merit to Olympia that wine has made its way. The reality is that Solari’s team has shown an occult car between them, apart, impeccable domestic step: that they lack character in decisive moments”, writes Faitelson.

“Who has the merit in the result? But to avoid the intentional game and suggest that this is the truck to get rid of a rival is very powerful. metas la violencia como herramienta “, contest Palomo.

For the most part, Fernando Palomo mentions that personality is a sure intention to play and not enter “in another football”, pues “la personalityid se se muestra a gritos ni a patadas”.

Faitelson points out that it is not necessary that there be a “personal lesson”“because it is known what has happened, but America allows a Central American team to maneuver its history, patadas, to murder or as sea”.

“I did not import the team’s procedure, less than seas xenophobic. The party to play with the violence as a system and it is tolerable, from my perspective to less. Do not pretend to teach David. But because I’m not interested”, annex Palomo to the conversation.

“Equivocas, because of the team’s progress in football, have rivalries, they have classics and they also have levels. It’s true that America is the only one of the level of Central American clubs. And it’s pretending to learn from you. conclusion Faitelson.

.Source