According to the Liduvina Escobar commissioner, in the last few days he has intensified his attacks as a part of precision and hospitality in return for his part in the Gobierno commission.
The commission of the Institute for Access to Public Information (IAIP), Liduvina Escobar, has announced a series of attacks against its colleagues because it is in favor of transparency and access to public information.
“In the last few days, a series of actions against me have intensified, as part of a strategy of pressure and hostility that is being implemented by the commissioners Ricardo Gómez, Javier Suárez and the commissioner Roxana Soriano,” he said in a statement.
The detail officer who is Islamist satisfied with the institutional work, block to have access to information, deducted with the IAIP staff, among others. “It is with the argument of tener denunciation in my case against an employee, that I have tried the hooks and without otorgárseme the right of defense”, explained.
I also blocked blocking to gain access to IAIP internal information. For example, on April 12, with the votes of the various titled mentions, it was agreed that all information generated by the administrative units of the institution should be approved for its entry into plenary.
Asimismo, exposes the commissioned referendums reunited with the IAIP staff present for the creditor, manipulating statements made at the press one day.
The Liduvina Escobar Commission states that it is responsible for accusations and Islamization in the institutional work of the three IAIP graduates. Photo: EDH / Archive
“In this encounter I express and accuse that my person generates instability in the institution and in the staff between other things”, according to the commissioner, who clarifies that he was not summoned to this meeting, to receive a grab of the mist.
The official informs about the use of the legal procedures as attacking it, detailing that on March 25, a statement was made in violation of a superstition revealed on his Twitter account of personal data of a user.
The Commissioner criticized the IAIP’s case for agility, admitting the difference, while in the hope there is a good number of large impact themed appeals.
On the other hand, there are permanent attacks on false accusations about the press and civil society.
The Commission has called on the civil society organizations, the press, international cooperation and human rights protection organizations to be vigilant in their actions which, in its judgment, “mark a reduction in the guarantee of an institution that is vigilant” the Complement of the Public Access to Information Act ”.
Finally, he advises that he assist the relevant agencies in his defense and protection.
Denuncian retraso
Mientras tanto, the Room of the Administrative Court of the Supreme Court has not been asked to respond to the numbering of the commission of the Institute for Public Access to Information (IAIP), Roxana Soriano, by his vote on the New Ideas party, donde was nominated in the primary elections of the 28th of February.
The request was made more than once by the National Fund for Development (Funde), which signaled the failure of Soriano’s independence to be able to take over as an IAIP commissioner.
From this time, I would like to say to the Chamber that during the request process, Soriano will be separated from the cargo that will be located at the Independentcia del Instituto.
Without embarrassment, Funde signaled that she had passed more of a knife and the Room had not been pronounced.
“This is exactly what is affecting and is a total guarantee that the IAIP’s commissioners are acting with Independence, that is, they are at risk and in the process of gaining access to public information”, advises Wilson Sandoval , Coordinator of the Funde Legal Anticorruption Center (ALC) de Funde.
The CSJ has no comments.