More importantly, it also measures methane, which is 80 times stronger than carbon dioxide over the next 20 years. You know it better than natural gas. Heating and cooking are not the only culprit methane. Two-thirds of the emissions come from bulging cows, factory farms and rotting landfills. But as any Texan will tell you, it is much easier to control gas coming from the ground than gas coming from cows.
“We have found that the Permian basin emits more than double any other oil and gas region in the United States,” Robinson said.
Prohibit all prohibitions
Then the Republican governor signed an executive order of his own and ordered each state agency to give him all the reasons to sue and stop the Biden government’s efforts to clean energy. In calling out cities like San Francisco, where a movement is growing to ban natural gas heaters and appliances from new construction, Abbott has vowed to ban all bans.
“In Texas, we will not allow cities to use political correctness to pretend what energy source you are using,” he said. “I therefore support legislation banning cities and provinces from banning natural gas appliances.”
But as a sign of the changing times, Abbott’s fierce opposition to the Paris Agreement contradicts the pronouncements and phrases of Big Oil’s biggest lobbyist.
“We think the threat of climate change is very real,” Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute (API), told CNN. “We support both operational action and action by the federal government in the United States and around the world to address this very important issue that we know is existential in nature.”
A call for more pipelines
As for Biden’s existential threat to oil and gas, Sommers seems less concerned and argues that there is no need to shift it to geothermal, solar or wind transitions, as the world will demand for generations fuel that fire and leak.
“This industry today produces about 60% of the world’s energy,” he said. “And the trend there is going to be a transition in energy. But I am also confident that this industry will continue for a long time to come.”
To solve the methane problem, he argues that if America just had more pipelines, the industry would not have to burn as much natural gas unnecessarily.
“I think the biggest challenge we have from an emissions perspective is to fix our infrastructure,” Sommers said. “We need to make sure we have pipelines to get these products to market as quickly as possible. And what that means is that we need a regulatory structure that makes it possible to build these pipelines.”
Kelsey Robinson of the EDF has a simpler idea. “Reducing methane emissions is in itself a job creator because we need people to investigate these sites and then take steps to resolve the leaks.”
“It does not make sense to burn it,” Texas state geologist Scott Tinker said as we walked the extensive Texas Rock Garden map outside his office. “They do not have the collection systems to capture it. Instead of licking the methane, they burn it and lick CO2. CO2 is better than a product than methane if you want to put something in the atmosphere. But it ‘ be much better at putting it together. ‘
After the recession in 2008, Tinker says, hydrofracking in West Texas came as a surprise. Years of deterioration in the oil field had a renaissance when the new method of spraying water into shale doubled oil production, and which formed with invisible methane, without capturing it.
“The conversation has shifted,” Tinker said, following pressure from the public and shareholders. “It’s happening, but it’s slow, it takes a lot of money, it’s pipeline approval. It’s an industry and a regulatory system that made it happen in the first place.”
“It brings producers, large and small, together to share technology and share best practices on how to reduce methane emissions,” he said. “And it works.”
Departure from space
But far beyond the methane problem, the only way to save lives on Earth and the fossil fuel industry is to develop carbon capture and storage technology on an astonishing scale. It requires advanced, expensive methane starters to be built around the smoke stacks of every petrochemical plant, power station and steel plant in the world.
Hopes for such a miracle had a major setback this week when the Petra Nova plant outside Houston closed indefinitely. Backed by a $ 190 million grant from the Department of Energy, the four-year plant aims to capture 90% of the carbon dioxide from a 240-megawatt coal-fired power station. It was the only major carbon capture project in the U.S. after a $ 7.5 billion project in Mississippi was shut down before it ever went online.
Exxon Mobil says they are working on 20 new carbon capture projects around the world, including one in Texas, as part of a new $ 3 billion investment in a company they call ExxonMobil Low Carbon Solutions.
But Robinson and her flying methane hunters have heard promises before. Without enforceable regulations for large and small producers, she says profit motive almost always wins.
“ExxonMobil and some of the other major manufacturers have set fairly high targets for how they want to maintain their emissions,” Robinson said. “But we have found that the leakage of methane into the Permian basin is more than ten times higher than many businesses intended.”
Meanwhile, she says she will let her small team fly, sniff and measure methane, while the plane will soon have a major backup. Following a $ 100 million grant from Amazon Fund Jeff Bezos’ Earth Fund, the EDF will soon launch its own methane search satellite.