A coalition of two states, including Arizona, Ohio, Nebraska, has demanded President Joe Biden. The rebellion of Republican officials in front of the Directors of the Democratic Union.
The President of the United States, Joe Biden, has called for a coalition of two states with Republican fiscal tax authorities to issue an executive order that will lead the country to the protection of the mid-term climate and freeze the climate crisis.
Who are you asking for?
The states of Arkansas, Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Carolina del Sur, Tennessee and Utah. The tax laws of these states, ideological conservatives, consider that Biden does not have the constitutional authority to implement regulations on the issue of gas emissions, meaning that this is a tariff that competes with Congress.
What was the order of Biden?
Hours after taking jurisdiction as president, Biden firmed the Orden Ejecutiva 13990, cual the pide to the federal agencies that calculate the social cost of contamination for ineffective gases.
And what is the social cost?
The social cost is the cost that must affront the society for the functioning of a business. This is due to the effects that the production of an economic activity can have in society, the qualities can be as negative as positive. These are the effects we call externalities.
An example of positive externality is education, there are many benefits to the population. While a negative exteriority we can find in the purchase of a new car that emits gases. It has a negative cost to society, which has a large effect on gas emissions and the effects that these can have on the health of the people.
It is understood that what Biden wants to do is carry out a projection to evaluate the pros and cons of carbon emissions and part of this evaluation can be a new rate in dollars for carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions .
You may be interested in: Crisis in Texas: Is the Green New Deal the culprit of the big deal?
It all implies that the companies that use energy are not renewable, as those that are involved in agricultural productivity, there will be an increase in their guests if they do not change through a process that is most compatible with the planet. And Republicans consider it possible to lose miles of jobs.
The experts live much time discussing what should be the exact cost of carbon dioxide released in the atmosphere. The progressive progressives, supported by science, should be much more than the actual. Conservatives, compared to the designs of the industries, say that the risks of the climatic change are overridden, and so are the costs of carbon emissions and the benefits of regulations.
We recommend: United States officially regresses to the Paris Agreement
“Establishing the ‘social cost’ of invertebrate emissions is a speculative, intrinsic tariff, a policy and indeterminate tariff, which implies intent to predict uncountable humanitarian, international and catastrophic migration futures. Assigning such values is a legislative action of excellence that falls within the exclusive authority of Congress, ”said the petitioner.
But there are “unconditional contingencies” that Republicans do not have any disputes with. The effects of the planet’s climatic change on the planet are obvious, only that the conservatives will not be able to maintain the fleet of negotiations with energy and renewables.
President Donald Trump dismantled the interinstitutional working group of experts that studied the social cost of energy consumption gases. It also reduced the value of the carbon dioxide metric to approximately US $ 1 and US $ 6, with the team of experts located at US $ 45.
This price is used for numerous regulatory processes regarding gas emissions. There are no such things as benefits for large companies, at a huge cost to humanity and above all for future generations. In 2020, the United States will experiment with a record of 22 extreme meteorological disasters. The change, moreover, was fueled by false arguments and ideological moves that denounced the reality of the gas emissions.
Biden, now, wants to increase the cost of the carbon dioxide meter metric to US $ 51. This new estimate conducts more stringent regulations on greenhouse gas emissions. But it is not enough. During the four years of the Trump administration, with the abrupt and aggravating adjustment of the social cost that is taking place in keeping with the scientific evidence, the world is losing time, and the United States is at odds with the climate change climate. The price of deberia is the carbon dioxide deberia tonel meter from US $ 125, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists.
The demands of the Republicans against Biden alone should destroy a plan with which it hopes to build a green and sustainable economy in order to benefit from future generations and all stadiums. Without embarrassment, it is the duty to pass a draft of this type pending an executive order that can be questioned in the federal courts. In order for Biden to advance on its agenda, these projects are appropriate for the Congress.
We recommend: Donald Trump and the climatic change, a natural disaster