Joe Biden’s governing body maintains the refugee allowance rate for this year at the same level as reduced by Donald Trump’s governing body diary The New York Times .
Biden has promised to increase refugee admissions to 60,000 this year, but will increase to 15,000 stipulated by its predecessor, which will reduce the admissions number in the market of its ‘zero tolerance policy’.
In February, President Biden compromised on the well-being of women who have been persecuted all over the world, raising the annual rate.
The mandate given by the mandate to allow the Department of State to recover a policy approved by Congress has been in place for four decades.
“How to approve an executive order to begin work on restoring our refugee admissions program to help meet a global need for precedents”, Biden assures executives of three orders which will revive, in part, Trump’s migration policy.
The Secretary of State, Antony J. Blinken, notified the Congress on February 12 that the planned administration would allow up to 62,500 refugees to enter the country by the tax year ending September 30, according to Time.
Politics vulnerable
The last step given by Biden is evidence of the vulnerability of its migration policy and the death of thousands of families who have suffered war and religious persecution in a limbo and are suffering from crime and insecurity.
“A bad news,” said Juan José Gutiérrez, executive director of One Stop Immigration in Los Angeles. “It includes a campaign and governing promise. Now we have the other promises, like the migration reform ”.
The New York Times dijo that the demora in the official designation of the refugee admissions has given hundreds of refugees authorized to travel to the United States held in camps all over the world.
Refugee Rehabilitation Agencies, which operate under the mandate of the High Commission of the United Nations for Refugees (ACNUR), are enforced with the decision and accuse Biden of promising an earlier promise to restore the status quo as well as .
Citing a high-ranking official of the administration, who had an anonymous condition for discussing the decision-making process, he periodically said that the governing establishment was preoccupied with increasing the number of Frontier Crosses of Minorities Unaccompanied (UAC) from the beginning and the Refugee Section of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Different system
Without embargo, detainees on the Mexican frontier seek refuge in the United States (the majority of the northern Triangular provinces, integrated with El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras) are being treated with a completely separate refugee system huyen de la persección en el extranjero.
The policy of asylum seekers is governed by other laws and compromises, between them the Judicial Flow Agreement of 1997 and the Ley TVPRA of 2008, on the prevention of human trafficking.
In addition, the asylum policy, different from the refugee program, indicates that the applicants for the case must be present before the Immigration Court and there is a judge who will decide on his future in the United States.
Who is Trump
In 2016, the last governing body of Barack Obama and Cual Biden to become Vice President, United States admits 100,000 extras to this state.
In July 2016, we had months to install it in the White House, Trump assured that he had “massive flood” of serious refugees haha United States, but did not explain that there is a long way to go to get permission to enter the country. This agreement was reached by the Republican Party, which accepted the presidential candidacy.
The magnate said, in this occasion, that “we will immediately suspend immigration from any nation that has been involved in terrorism until we have tried rigorous recruitment mechanisms”.
Through the speeches of entities candidate surrogate surgeon in turn to the refugee program. What is not explained in detail? How many times have you experienced the pain of revision and conquest? Are the attacks only part of a campaign strategy? Is it true that the United States has “massive floods” of refugees, as Trump insures?
Are you realists
“We do not know how successful Biden’s will be in threatening Trump’s migration policy and reclaiming what Congress and Biden promised,” said in February Lilia Velásquez, assistant professor of law at the University of California, San Diego.
“The Biden proposal contains many provisions, including ten centers for the registration of United States refugees. This is also why it puts pressure on asylum policy, ”he said.
“I have no doubt that it is an ambitious policy,” he said. “But what we do not know is how successful it can be. Now we can say ‘qué maravilla’, if we eat a lot, without embarrassment, we do not know that we have it And, of course, it is quite difficult to read as a refugee in the United States ”.
Velásquez dijo además que “tanto in the refugee policy as in the asylum, if we see the numbers of persons that are approved and we compare with the number of solicitudes, we call the unpleasant surprise that the number is small. You have the right to seek refuge or asylum, but you do not want to know who will approve the benefit. All depends on the evidence that is attached to a solicitation. He is a realist ”.
