It is difficult to care for prints that have sunk 238,900 miles into the ground, as mankind has the combined burden of an unforgivable virus and political discomfort. But how man treats these boot prints and the historical lunar landing areas on which they occur speak volumes of who we are and who we want to become.
On December 31, the law became One Small Step to Protect Human Heritage in Space Law. As for laws, it’s pretty benign. This requires companies that work with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on lunar missions to agree to be bound by otherwise unenforceable guidelines to protect US landing sites on the Moon. It’s a fairly small pool of affected entities. However, it is also the first law enacted by any nation that recognizes the existence of human heritage in outer space. This is important because it reaffirms our human commitment to the protection of our history – as we do on earth with sites such as the Historic Sanctuary or Machu Picchu, which are protected by instruments such as the World Heritage Convention – while acknowledging that the human species in the expand space. .
I am a lawyer who focuses on space issues who want to ensure the peaceful and sustainable exploration and use of space. I believe that people through space can achieve world peace. To do this, we must recognize landing sites on the Moon and other celestial bodies as the universal human achievements that they are, built on the research and dreams of scientists and engineers that stretch across this globe over the centuries. I believe that the One Small Step Act, enacted in a divisive political environment, shows that space and preservation are truly non-partisan, and even unifying principles.
The moon is fast approaching
It’s just a matter of decades, maybe just years, before we see a continuous human presence on the Moon.
While it would be nice to think that a human community on the moon would be a collaborative, multinational utopia – although it is located in what Buzz Aldrin famously described as a ‘wonderful desolation’, the fact that humans are each other again chasing to reach us moon neighbor.
The American Artemis project, which aims to send the first woman to the Moon in 2024, is the most ambitious mission. Russia has revived its Luna program and set the stage to place cosmonauts on the Moon in the 2030s. However, in a race that was once reserved for superpowers, there are now several countries and several private companies with an interest.
India plans to send a rover to the Moon this year. China, which in December implemented the first successful lunar return mission since 1976, announced several lunar landings in the coming years, with the Chinese media’s plans for a mission to the moon within a decade. South Korea and Japan are also building lunar landers and probes.
Private companies such as Astrobotic, Masten Space Systems and Intuitive Machines are supporting NASA missions. Other companies, such as ispace, Blue Moon and SpaceX, are also supporting NASA missions, but are also offering private missions, including for tourism. How are all these different entities going to work around each other?
Space is not lawless. The 1967 Spatial Convention, now ratified by 110 countries, including all current spatial countries, provides guiding principles that support the concept of space as the province of all mankind. The treaty explicitly states that all countries and, by implication, their citizens have the freedom to explore and liberate all areas of the Moon.
That’s right. Everyone has the freedom to wander where they want – over Neil Armstrong’s shotprint, close to sensitive scientific experiments or to a mining industry. There is no understanding of property on the moon. The only restriction on this freedom is the emphasis in Article IX of the Convention that all activities on the moon must take place taking into account the corresponding interests of all others and the requirement that you consult with others if you can cause ‘harmful interference’.
What does it mean? From a legal point of view, no one knows.
Outstanding universal value
It can be reasonably argued that interference with an experiment or a lunar mining operation would be harmful, cause quantifiable damage and thus violate the treaty.
But what about an abandoned spacecraft, like the Eagle, the Apollo 11 lunar lander? Do we really want to rely on “proper respect” to prevent the intentional or unintentional destruction of this inspiring piece of history? This object commemorates the work of the hundreds of thousands of individuals who worked to place man on the moon, the astronauts and cosmonauts who gave their lives to reach the stars, and the silent heroes, such as Katherine Johnson, who practiced mathematics. made it so.
The lunar landing sites – from Luna 2, the first human object to affect the moon, to each of the crew of Apollo missions, to Chang-e 4, which used the first rover on the other side of the moon – testify especially to the greatest technological achievement of mankind to date. It symbolizes everything we have achieved as a species, and holds such promises for the future.
[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter.]
The One Small Step Act is true to its name. This is a small step. This only applies to companies that work with NASA; it only applies to US lunar landings; it implements outdated and untested recommendations to protect historic lunar sites implemented by NASA in 2011. However, it offers significant breakthroughs. This is the first legislation of any nation that recognizes an extraterrestrial website as an ‘extraordinary universal value’ to mankind. The language is derived from the unanimously ratified World Heritage Convention.
The law also encourages the development of best practices to protect human heritage in space by developing the concepts of proper consideration and harmful interference – an evolution that will also guide the way nations and societies work around each other. However small it may be, the recognition and protection of historic sites is the first step in developing a peaceful, sustainable and successful lunar management model.
The boat prints are not yet protected. There is a long way to go to reach an enforceable multilateral / universal agreement to govern the protection, preservation or commemoration of all human heritage in space, but the One Small Step Act should give us all hope for the future in the space and here on earth.
This article was published from The Conversation, a non-profit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It was written by: Michelle LD Hanlon, University of Mississippi.
Read more:
Michelle LD Hanlon is affiliated with For All Moonkind, a 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization that seeks to protect each of the six human lunar landings and similar sites in outer space as part of our common human heritage.