The American Journal of Medicine (AJM), the medical and official journal review of the Alliance for EE.UU Internal Academic Medicine, has not reviewed the hydroxychloroquina for coronavirus, as well as publications and social speeches in Brazil and Brazil .
‘N Reis van Facebook en Twitter, varios usarios han compartido imagenes y textos que aseguran que dicho magacín, creado en 1946, “informa ahora que la hidroxicloroquina, de hecho, contrarresta y cura la COVID-19”, luego de meses de polité politico and medicine about the drug drug as a prophylaxis against the virus.
Inklusief, one of the circulars in the United States with complaints that President Donald Trump, who defended his government during his speech, “tried again that ten reasons” and that “the opposition of the Liberals and including the satanization to his recommendations costaron miles of vidas “.
According to this publication, shared more than 700 times, “90% of the deaths caused by the powdery mildew are avoided” and the “guilty culprits” the liberals, democrats, the mediocre media “in doctor Antony Fauci, who died in the Government of Joe Biden looks at the cap of the antique window at EE.UU.
This very type of message has also appeared in Brazil, another country called Gobierno, in this case the command by Jair Bolsonaro, has already supported the use of this substance.
Hecho, the suramerican country has boosted its use citing various forums and currently an article published in a second passage in the AJM, in which various scientific exposures the possibilities of pharmacy as possible preventive treatment.
As part of the alliance, Brazilian social media advocates have hated the supremacy of the review and critique that with these “tests” it has been recommended by medicine, that the North American University of Johns Hopkins has been tried alone against arthritis. , lupus and malaria syndromes.
“The American Journal of Medicine’s scientific publication publishes studies on the efficacy of this treatment in order for Facebook to confirm that it needs to be silenced,” he said.
DATES: The American Journal of Medicine has denied any wrongdoing against hydroxychloroquina as an antidote. The publication responds to the quotes from the Brazilian Gobierno of the article published in its pages and makes it clear that its use, in agreement with new studies more concluding, can be read “given” to the organism.
The editors of the medical magazine will issue a comment on the 17th of February to clarify that “nothing can be more important to the world” than the intentions of Gobierno de Bolsonaro to use the term “proof” of the hydroxychloroquina cura la covid -19 that publication has been approved for use.
The AJM is not a regulatory agency or an arbitrator of political and scientific disputes.
“It is completely inaccurate to claim that the AJM has responded to a therapeutic intervention”, added, to explain that well, in its pages circulated a company card by a group of scientists who support the use of medicine, it is ” dañino “de la sustancia.
“The article that the Brazilian Gobierno cites as ‘proof’ of the effects of sustainability is published in PubMed before the demonstration studies show that hydroxychloroquina has more than good results. .
Finally, the publication results as well as this scientific article published in its pages also others he advertises on his form part of his previous editions.
VN MEDICAMENTO POLITIZADO
The hydroxychloroquina has been converted into a popular drug by a decade of scientific studies that Buscaban confirms its effectiveness against the covid-19 pandemic as well as the heck of figures like Trump or the Brazilian president recommended by us.
The former president refuses to give up on multiple occasions during his administration (2017-2021) to this pharmacy as a possible treatment for covid-19e, including, he has to affirm – months before he or she does the virus- which he establishes.
In March 2020, following the publication of one of the first investigations into the pharmacy, carried out in France, the Republican leader began to discuss that “hydroxychloroquina and azithromycin could change the game in the history of medicine”.
In these different cases, when Brazil was the second country in the world with more cases of COVID-19, Bolsonaro impulse a protocol for the treatment of coronavirus patients that amps the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquina in live cases.
“There is no scientific test, but it has been experimented with and used in Brazil and all over the world. All forms: we are in war” and “because we are deranged and the pride of not having laughed”, Bolsonaro results in his account from Twitter.
The statements of these world leaders hiccuped that the animal was agitated by weeks and generated complications for the treatment of patients with lupus or arthritis, as well as reporting various medical organizations.
LA OMS DESACONSEJA SU USO
Finally, the same thing as the use of hydroxychloroquina was “strongly” disagreed with by a group of experts from the World Health Organization (WHO).
According to an article in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) útwerk deur el Grupo de Desarrollo de Directrices de la OMS, this pharmacy has given itself a “priority of investigation” and the resources must be centered on other candidates.
The “company recommendation” is based on “high-certainty tests” procedures of six high-risk auditorium tests with more than 6,000 participants, with its exposure known to an infected person by SARS-Cov-2.
Hydroxychloroquina, according to what experts call high-certainty tests, “has no significant effect on death and hospital admission.”
With EFE information
