A last-ditch attempt by Amazon to postpone a union vote at one of its larger warehouses failed, paving the way for the first serious attempt to organize workers at the technology giant since then. a failed attempt in Delaware in 2014.
The National Labor Relations Council confirmed Friday that nearly 6,000 workers at the company’s fulfillment center in Bessemer, Ala. can use voice mail to determine if the pivot point will connect the retail, wholesale and department store union (RWDSU). In doing so, the agency shot down objections that Amazon had previously filed with them regarding the union battle.
Workers originally filed for law to a vote on the association of November last year and then the NLRB gave them that right. Yet Amazon quickly tried to deter and delay this scenario, appeal in January questioned the office’s original ruling. The technology giant also demanded that workers vote by mail instead of by post attend a personal vote, despite pandemic health risks.
However, in its ruling on Friday, the NLRB said that the petition to vote on trade union ‘does not raise any material issues that are being reviewed’ and that it can proceed. The agency also shot down Amazon’s attempt to force a personal vote. As a result of the decision, Bessemer workers will be able to start voting on the initiative next Monday, February 8, and continue until March 29.
G / O Media can get a commission
Amazon struggles with efforts to organize labor took place across the country—And his tactics to deter and discourage such efforts have often happened involve draconian supervision of activists and employees, including Hiring Pinkterton Detectives, amongst other things.
In the midst of all this, Bessemer has emerged as an important pressure point in the technology giant’s labor management conflicts. Local activism helped galvanize the pressure for extended protection, although the company went to great lengths to discourage workers. It was recently reported that Bessemer employees are taken in ‘propaganda sessions’ where managers try to promote doubt about the union. This is perhaps not surprising, as there is a lot of riding on this upcoming mood. As Bloomberg reported:
A defeat for the union would tarnish the reputation of the labor movement, which has repeatedly failed to organize workers at America’s second-largest private employer after Walmart. A union victory, by contrast, would provide a tactical roadmap for hundreds of thousands of people toiling in Amazon facilities.
“Once again, Amazon workers have once again won a battle in their bid to win a union vote,” Chelsea Connor, director of communications at RWDSU, said after the NLRB decision. “Amazon’s blatant disregard for the health and safety of its own workforce has once again been demonstrated by its insistence on a personal election in the midst of the pandemic. Today’s decision proves that it’s been a long time since Amazon started respecting its own employees; and allow them to cast their votes without intimidation and interference. ”
Amazon spokesman, reached by email Friday Heather Knox said the company was “disappointed” with the NLRB’s decision, claiming that the postal vote would reduce participation: the NLRB for not voting, to provide the fairest and most effective format for achieving maximum employee participation, ”Knox said in a statement.. She further claims that the subscription will be less effective than Amazon planned as an alternative: a ‘on-site safe election process ratified by covid-19 experts who would empower our staff to vote on the way to, during, and from their already scheduled shifts. ”
Vote somehow as you race back and forth between the company-assigned tasks – at a possiblesuper-distributor event, ”No less – does not seem quite as effective as voting from the comfort of your own home. Indeed, instead of seeing it as an attempt to increase voter turnout, it may even be interpreted as a way to ward it off.