A few points he made, such as the seriousness of the charges of bribery in the media and the inherent conflict of interest in upholding the public’s faith, he made before when a petition was filed before calling witnesses against Netanyahu started.
However, some points were new.
The attorney general said the intensity of the prime minister’s attacks on law enforcers exceeded what could serve as a basis for declaring him unfit if such deterioration were to continue beyond a certain unknown point.
He said Netanyahu’s failure to appoint a justice minister was another sign that he could eventually be declared incompetent, even if the law did not require resignation if he retained normal government positions.
However, Mandelblit eventually said that Netanyahu could remain in office for the time being in view of the fact that he had limited the attorney general to him – to stay away from involvement in law enforcement and judicial appointments, as well as policy changes that a can affect him. trial.
cnxps.cmd.push (function () {cnxps ({playerId: ’36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b’}). deliver (‘4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6’);});
if (window.location.pathname.indexOf (“656089”)! = -1) {console.log (“hedva connatix”); document.getElementsByClassName (“divConnatix”)[0].style.display = “none”;}
Furthermore, the attorney general said that Netanyahu has not yet committed a clear disqualifying act showing that he is incapable of continuing his duties, even if he seems to be getting closer to that point.
Implied in Mandelblit’s legal order to the Supreme Court was the fact that Netanyahu has so far not had to attend much of his trial, and since May 2020 has only missed the prime minister’s venture for several hours at a time.